Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register  


You are here: Index > Anthropology > Anthropology > Topic : Sin Nature

2


Threaded Mode | Tell a friend | Print  

Sin Nature
ronathanedwards
Group: Member
Posts: 192
Status:
The nature of man is important, we should continue this topic.

How does a dead man, do anything? Can He submit to God's Law?
One of God's Commands is "Repent and Beleive". Another is BE PERFECT as your father in heaven is perfect. How can a man that is dead in the FLESH please God, when it says that a man in the flesh can NOT please God. Is faith pleasing to God? How does the New Covenant play a role in this. What is the "cutting" of the Covenant and what was the Promise of it? Was the promise a promise to DO something? Or a promise to react to something?


-----------------------
Truth invites scrutiny, only error fears close examination. ~ Atruro Azurdia
IP: --   

Sin Nature
Divinesoteriology
Group: Administrator
Posts: 487
Status:

Ordo Solutis) Drawing, Faith, Union with Christ which entails Justification, Regeneration, Adoption
Quote From : ronathanedwards March 1, 2010, 12:12 pm
The nature of man is important, we should continue this topic.

How does a dead man, do anything? Can He submit to God's Law?
One of God's Commands is "Repent and Beleive". Another is BE PERFECT as your father in heaven is perfect. How can a man that is dead in the FLESH please God, when it says that a man in the flesh can NOT please God. Is faith pleasing to God? How does the New Covenant play a role in this. What is the "cutting" of the Covenant and what was the Promise of it? Was the promise a promise to DO something? Or a promise to react to something?


First that is not a response to my post. But I will answer your questions in hopes that you will still go back and respond to what I had posted prior.

To your question... One dead in his sins cannot repent unless God draws and enlightens him.  It is by the grace of God that will have the ability to respond.


-----------------------
Faith is not knowing what the future holds, but knowing who holds the future.
IP: --   

Sin Nature
ronathanedwards
Group: Member
Posts: 192
Status:
Quote
It is by the grace of God that will have the ability to respond.


So then, everyone has been given this "grace" that you percieve as an ABILITY to choose Him?

-----------------------
Truth invites scrutiny, only error fears close examination. ~ Atruro Azurdia
IP: --   

Sin Nature
Divinesoteriology
Group: Administrator
Posts: 487
Status:

Ordo Solutis) Drawing, Faith, Union with Christ which entails Justification, Regeneration, Adoption
Quote
So then, everyone has been given this "grace" that you percieve as an ABILITY to choose Him?
   
   


The true light, which enlightens everyone, was coming into the world. ” (John 1:9, ESV)
Yes, everyone is enlightened and drawn
And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself.” ” (John 12:32, ESV)
This is why the Holy Spirit convicts the world of sin





-----------------------
Faith is not knowing what the future holds, but knowing who holds the future.
IP: --   

Sin Nature
ronathanedwards
Group: Member
Posts: 192
Status:
Quote
The true light, which enlightens everyone, was coming into the world


This doesn't mean anything as far as giving man an ability at all. You are implying into scripture again. It doesn't say that this enlightenment has anything to do with giving man "ability". This again is a MAJOR implication.

This "light" is what is used to shine light upon man's sin and shows them their wicked state. It doesn't speak of thier ability at all.

John 12 has been discussed and does not agree with John 6:44. The "him" Jesus links with the one being drawn is the same "him" that is resurrected to life.

Unless you want to be a universalist (who at least see the obvious connection in 6:44 in conjunction with John 12) You must consider you might be mistaken on who Jesus was talking about in J.12.

There isn't any other way to take these contexts. First of all J6 is a totally different context than J12.  Besides that, you have to see the one being drawn is the one being resurrected and 12 means something else OR you are a Universalist.


-----------------------
Truth invites scrutiny, only error fears close examination. ~ Atruro Azurdia
IP: --   

Sin Nature
Divinesoteriology
Group: Administrator
Posts: 487
Status:

Ordo Solutis) Drawing, Faith, Union with Christ which entails Justification, Regeneration, Adoption
Quote
This doesn't mean anything as far as giving man an ability at all. You
are implying into scripture again. It doesn't say that this
enlightenment has anything to do with giving man "ability". This again
is a MAJOR implication.


You err not knowing the scriptures nor the power of God. The scriptures say that natural man cannot understand the things of God. Hence he must be enlightened to have the ability to do so. All of scripture attest to itself.

John 12:32 does agree with John 6:44 those that are drawn will be raised up, however if you read what precedes it is those that are given by the father that will be raised up. That is the context of those in John 6:44. John 6:44 is speaking of a specific people (those given by the father) John 12:32 speaks of all (universal). All are drawn but it is those that are drawn and have been given to the son by the father that are raised up.

Out of all that are drawn it is only those that have been given to the son will be raised up on the last day. John 6 is talking about the same people (those given) all the way through. It is not talking about all men like John 12:32. Same term to contexts.





-----------------------
Faith is not knowing what the future holds, but knowing who holds the future.
IP: --   

Sin Nature
ronathanedwards
Group: Member
Posts: 192
Status:
Quote
Hence he must be enlightened to have the ability to do so. All of scripture attest to itself.


You are quesiton begging and inferring. This does not say that this "light" gives ability. You are inferring and falsly equvocating enlightenment with the renosance understanding of the term. It not explict in the verse. 

John 3:19 (ESV)

19 And this is the judgment: the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil.


The effect of the light isn't giving "ability". It only shows that they are evil. Those who are evil hate the light, those whoever does what is true goes to the light THAT IT MY BE CLEARLY SEEN that his works have been CARRIED OUT (passive, in other words done TO him) in GOD.

First of all the works of one who does what is true is a work of GOD. Secondly this again does not talk about abillity, rather it shows EFFECTS of the light. Therefore, the enlightenment only shows man's state and doesn't say anthing of ones ability. The only explicit verse that talks about ability is Paul saying the Natural man (with the "enlightenment" STILL can not obey God's law. The natural man (with enlightenment) does not understand the things of God, this is the man with a HEART of stone or the "fleshly mind".

You are presupposing ability with the enlightenment. This is an improper inference and is eisogesis.

John even undergirds the explanation of those who do the truth with it being a work of God and does not attribute it with man whatsoever, so your still left with no exegetical proof that this enlightenment enables the natural man. In fact, it only makes Paul's arguement even stronger. The natural man KNOWS he is evil BECAUSE of that enlightenment, yet BEING NATURAL hates the things of God. Enablement has not yet occurred. A work of God needs to be done for the natural man "who has been enlightened to the truth" in order for that man to believe. This is regeneration.


As for drawing. The ONE drawn is the one raised. The two are tied together by the pronoun. You however are forced to make a distinction  between the one given and the one drawn. However, the text makes no such difference. Actually, the text ties the three together. The one given is the one drawn who is the one resurrected.

The one drawn is resurrected to life. If you say ALL are DRAWN, then ALL are Resurreceted to life.  Hence you have universalism.


Edited by ronathanedwards : March 11, 2010, 11:42 am

-----------------------
Truth invites scrutiny, only error fears close examination. ~ Atruro Azurdia
IP: --   

Sin Nature
Divinesoteriology
Group: Administrator
Posts: 487
Status:

Ordo Solutis) Drawing, Faith, Union with Christ which entails Justification, Regeneration, Adoption
Quote
You are quesiton begging and inferring. This does not say that this
"light" gives ability. You are inferring and falsly equvocating
enlightenment with the renosance understanding of the term. It not
explict in the verse.


The point of light is the give the ability to see. The unregenerate are in darkness and cannot see. God brings light to the darkness and enables people to see. I find it funny that the simple things you turn into what you have. Much like John 5:24.


-----------------------
Faith is not knowing what the future holds, but knowing who holds the future.
IP: --   

Sin Nature
ronathanedwards
Group: Member
Posts: 192
Status:
Do you know what an inference is? You are overruling an explicit verses: "the natural man can not understand the things of God; the natural man can not obey God, the natural man can not please God", with an implied understanding of a verse. The explicit retricts the implicit. You are doing the exact opposite.

The only thing it says is natural mean have light shined in them. That's it. It is a simple indicative statement. It does not say that it gives them ABILITY at all. It does not say that this light gives a natural man the ability to change his nature. You are adding that to the text due to your tradition. Look at the verse for what it says, not what you want it to mean. An explicit verse saying what you want it to mean would be like thise:
The light which enlightens all men in order for them to change their hearts from stone to flesh; or the light which enlightens all men in order for them to understand the gospel....

But that information is not there, your understanding is left wanting.

-----------------------
Truth invites scrutiny, only error fears close examination. ~ Atruro Azurdia
IP: --   

Sin Nature
Divinesoteriology
Group: Administrator
Posts: 487
Status:

Ordo Solutis) Drawing, Faith, Union with Christ which entails Justification, Regeneration, Adoption
Quote From : ronathanedwards March 12, 2010, 7:26 am
Do you know what an inference is? You are overruling an explicit verses: "the natural man can not understand the things of God; the natural man can not obey God, the natural man can not please God", with an implied understanding of a verse. The explicit retricts the implicit. You are doing the exact opposite.

The only thing it says is natural mean have light shined in them. That's it. It is a simple indicative statement. It does not say that it gives them ABILITY at all. It does not say that this light gives a natural man the ability to change his nature. You are adding that to the text due to your tradition. Look at the verse for what it says, not what you want it to mean. An explicit verse saying what you want it to mean would be like thise:
The light which enlightens all men in order for them to change their hearts from stone to flesh; or the light which enlightens all men in order for them to understand the gospel....

But that information is not there, your understanding is left wanting.


What does it mean ? Is it just a meaningless text ? Or is it part of the same paragraph that is used in an evangelistic way ? My understanding derives from the context. Read the context and you will understand. The doctrine of enlightenment is not nothing new.
Blessings.


-----------------------
Faith is not knowing what the future holds, but knowing who holds the future.
IP: --   

Sin Nature
ronathanedwards
Group: Member
Posts: 192
Status:
Quote
What does it mean ? Is it just a meaningless text ? 


Nope, it isn't meaningless, but it is a simple indicative statement and is NOT explicit. Proper hermeneutics demands the explicit governs the implicit.
You are implying that enlightenment MEANS giving "ability". It does NOT say that, nor is there ONE explicit verse that says natural man has the ability to choose Christ because ALL men were given a "special understanding" BY Christ in order for everyman to have the same equal chance for salvation.

You have "natural" "dead" "fleshly" men being enlightened to be "enabled", yet Paul NEVER alludes to this at all. Paul is very precise and explicit about the natural man.

He does not seek after God, He can not understand Spiritual things, He has a heart of stone, He can not obey the law of God.

The enlightenment therefore can not mean that it "gives" man ability, since they are still "natural" (it doesn't say that the light makes men spiritual) they STILL can not UNDERSTAND what that "enlightenment" is anyways, therefore your meaning is useless.

The explicit governs the implicit. The natural man can not understand spiritual things. Paul didn't say "The natural man can not understand spiritual things "until he is enlightened which happened to every man when Christ came". Yet Paul was very explicit saying "The natural man (period) does not understand the things of God. This would INCLUDE natural men who have been given the LIGHT of the World. This is why they HATE the light and do not COME TO the light. And it is also the basis for us to seek another explanation of why those "who do the truth" come to the light BECAUSE of the explicit nature of Paul's writings (and of John's OWN writing in 1 John 5:1.
Quote
The doctrine of enlightenment is not nothing new 


Yes, neither is Pelagianism, that doesn't mean anything.


-----------------------
Truth invites scrutiny, only error fears close examination. ~ Atruro Azurdia
IP: --   

Sin Nature
eternally-gratefull
Group: Elite Member
Posts: 292
Status:
I do not think I would ever understand a God who calls himself righteous and just,

1. would send a person to hell he never even gave the opportunity, nor the ability to receive his gospel of love.

2.  this same God could condemn a person, saying he condems them because they did not believe, when he never gave them the opportunity, nor the ability to do the very thing he is condemning them for..

What kind of God does this?
IP: --   

Sin Nature
ronathanedwards
Group: Member
Posts: 192
Status:
Quote
I do not think I would ever understand a God who calls himself righteous and just,

1. would send a person to hell he never even gave the opportunity, nor the ability to receive his gospel of love.

2.  this same God could condemn a person, saying he condems them because they did not believe, when he never gave them the opportunity, nor the ability to do the very thing he is condemning them for..

What kind of God does this?


Election and reprobation rely on distinct foundations. On the one hand, election rests on the eternal redeeming love of God to save certain lost individuals, while on the other; reprobation rests on the moral necessity to manifest to all creation the nature and consequences of sin. Moreover, while election is dependent on divine grace, reprobation is dependent on individual personal sin. While there is grace to some, there is no injustice to any!

In addition, while God’s eternal counsel brings glory to himself (Eph. 1:5, 11; Rom. 9), it does not necessarily bring emotional pleasure to Him. For example, God ordained the very crucifixion of His own Son (Acts 2:23; 1 Pet. 1:18-21), but it did not bring Him pleasure in that He was laughing that day of days. Yes, He was satisfied that His Son died to save the elect, but what brings satisfaction, does not always equate to emotional pleasure. Furthermore, Paul reveals to us that God is glorified in that some of his eternal decrees are designed to allow Him to express His wrath (Rom. 9:22-23), but this does not mean He has a smile on His face or pleasure in His heart when they occur. As Ezekiel states, “Say to them, 'As surely as I live, declares the Sovereign LORD, I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that they turn from their ways and live. Turn! Turn from your evil ways! Why will you die, O house of Israel?'” (33:11; e.g. 18:23, 32; 2 Pet. 3:9). As a former homicide detective, I have seen people sentenced to death. I have seen the sentence of death carried out on murderers. However, while I knew justice was being served, I was not laughing, smiling, nor did I go home with pleasure in my heart. Rather, I was saddened that things had to end the way they did, but MUST they MUST.

Herman Hoeksema states, “Reprobation exists in order that election may be realized. Reprobation is necessary to bring the chosen to the glory which God in His infinite love has appointed for them” (The Place of Reprobation in the Preaching of the Gospel). In that God reprobates there is no doubt. The Scripture states, “The LORD hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil” (Prov. 16:4). That God uses them for His glory there can be doubt either as He says, “The righteous man is rescued from trouble, and it comes on the wicked instead” (Prov. 11:8). Hoeksema states again:

The idea here is that the ungodly serve to deliver the righteous out of trouble, to glorify them. And having done so they perish for their sins. Still stronger is the language of Proverbs 21:18: "The wicked shall be a ransom for the righteous, and the transgressor for the upright." Here again we have the idea that God gives the wicked as a ransom, which He pays to glorify the righteous.
This is exampled in nature. Hoeksema reveals:
It is no different in the lives of individuals, or individual persons and animals. The mother gives life to her child, not infrequently at the expense of her own. It is virtually always true that one generation lives and dies to make room for the next. There are species of animals in which the male dies after mating. The male is cast off (reprobated) to give life to the young.

According to the Scriptures, it is no different in the plant kingdom. When a farmer sows seed in his field, he sows much more than he needs. When the seed falls into the earth and dies, there appear not only the kernels of wheat, for which the seed was planted, but also the stem, the straw, and even the chaff. Without the stem and the chaff the grain could never have germinated and ripened. The stem and the chaff serve the grain, the seed. Yet both will presently be burned by fire in order that the grain may be gathered into the barn. Here also we find election and reprobation, and in such a way that the latter serves the former, and is necessary to it.
No wonder all creation groans for the manifestations of the sons of God (Rom. 8:18-23).

Nature is not the only testimony to this. This is seen by example in the very life of Israel. God declares, “Since you are precious and honored in my sight, and because I love you, I will give men in exchange for you, and people in exchange for your life" (Isa. 43:4).  As Hoeksema states, “The text says that, in order to accomplish this, God has given other people in the place of His chosen people. Because He loved His people, those others had to pay for Israel's salvation with their own lives.” God’s church, His very people, are “a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, [and] a peculiar people” (1 Pet. 2:9). Because He has set His love upon them (Num. 6:23-27), He will bring about their salvation (Jer. 24:6). God even uses the reprobation of others to bring about the salvation of His elect. Scripture proves this time and again. He delivered Israel at the cost of Pharaoh and his nation, did He not? He delivered Israel at the cost of Goliath, did He not?

Next, let us look at the question itself: “How can a loving God knowingly create a person that he knows will reject Him and therefore spend eternity in Hell?”

First, the Scripture states:

Romans 9:11-23 Yet, before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad—in order that God's purpose in election might stand: not by works but by him who calls—she was told, "The older will serve the younger."Just as it is written: "Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated." What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all! For he says to Moses, "I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion." It does not, therefore, depend on man's desire or effort, but on God's mercy. For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: "I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth." Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden. One of you will say to me: "Then why does God still blame us? For who resists his will?" But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? "Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, 'Why did you make me like this?' "Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for noble purposes and some for common use? What if God, choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath—prepared for destruction? What if he did this to make the riches of his glory known to the objects of his mercy, whom he prepared in advance for glory—even us, whom he also called, not only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles?
In Paul’s answer, I observe that God is sovereign and He has a right to do as He wills in all the earth (1 Chron. 16:14; Isa. 55:11). This is the truth of the situation. Think of it like this: Do you tell your boss who to hire and fire if you are just a janitor? Of course not! Neither does anyone tell God whom to save. It is not even proper to ask the question, which Paul emphasizes saying, “But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? "Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, 'Why did you make me like this?'”

Second, this question assumes error. The question assumes that all created persons are innocent and not worthy of judgment. While God created man – very good – without sin (Gen. 1:31), man chose to fall – chose to sin, chose to be unholy and is worthy of temporary and eternal judgment (Gen. 3). Adam is the Federal Head of all mankind and all of us (save Christ, born of virgin conception) are fallen in him (Rom. 5:12-19). Not only are we fallen in Adam and born in iniquity (Ps. 51:5), but we also are sinners in our own right (Rom. 3:23). This is known as Total Depravity. By Adam’s sinful choice, man is not born innocent, but rather worthy of eternal punishment!

God created the first couple in the image of God (Gen. 1:27) - perfect. However, man – not God – corrupted and deadened this image. Therefore, now God may only create man according to man’s present fallen nature. For God to otherwise would be against His holy and just nature. Therefore, God necessarily must create all men (save Christ who was foreordained otherwise) since Adam and Eve according to their nature – which is sinful and fallen in Adam. Not to do so would make Him a liar and a deceiver. Therefore, children at birth are rightfully born into sin.

Therefore, the proper phrasing of this question should be “How can a loving God knowingly save a fallen person who hates Him (Rom. 3:10-18) and is worthy to spend eternity in Hell (2 Pet. 2:1-9)?” Since all men are sinners from birth and deserve eternal judgment in Hell, God could not save a single soul unless He had elected them before they were created (John 1:13; Eph. 1:1-11; Rom. 9; 11:5; Col. 3:12; 1 Thess. 1:4; 2 Tim. 2:10; 1 Pet. 1:2; 1 Pet. 5:13, etc.). Therefore, because of this agreement (Covenant of Redemption) before the foundation of the world (1 Pet. 1:18-21) God can and will save only the elect. He indeed is loving in that He choose to save any.

One may ask why did not God then elect ALL people from the foundation of the world? God states in Isaiah 55:8-9, “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.” If we believe this, then why do we question God’s Love? In addition, Paul answers in Romans saying, "Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for noble purposes and some for common use? What if God, choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath—prepared for destruction?” Simply, it is God’s prerogative. Note that He does have a purpose – a holy purpose – “to show His wrath” and “make His power known.”

This leads us to point three, God is not only a loving God (John 3:16), but a holy (Ex. 15:11; Psa. 103:1; Isa. 6:3) and just (Deut. 32:4; Job 4:17; 8:3; Psa. 89:14, etc.) God that MUST necessarily judge sin (John 3:18). Therefore, there must necessarily be those that are judged. There must also necessarily be a Hell. If neither of these existed then God would simply not be God – as the punishment of evil would only be a farce – not real – a deception. However, God does not lie (Num. 23:19; 1 Sam. 15:29; Psa. 92:15; Mal. 3:6; Rom. 3:4; Heb. 6:18) and therefore sin must, will be, and is punished.

Therefore, we see statements of reprobation compared to election in Scripture:
Revelation 13:8, “And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world” and Revelation 17:8, “The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is,” as compared to, Ephesians 1:4-5, “According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love: Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,” and Revelation 21:27, “And there shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life.”
or,
1 Peter 2:6-7a, “Wherefore also it is contained in the scripture, Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious: and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded. Unto you therefore which believe he is precious:” as compared to 1 Peter 7b-8, “but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner, And a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also they were appointed” as compared to Peter 2:9, “But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light.”
or again, when God does not send His miracles when they WOULD HAVE changed a nation,

Matthew 11:20-27 Then began he to upbraid the cities wherein most of his mighty works were done, because they repented not: Woe unto thee, Chorazin! woe unto thee, Bethsaida! for if the mighty works, which were done in you, had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes. But I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the day of judgment, than for you. And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. But I say unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee. At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes. Even so, Father: for so it seemed good in thy sight. All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him.
or again,

John 10:26-27 “But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me.” There are elect sheep and there are lost goats (Matt. 25:31-46).

The fact that some will go to Hell is not God’s fault, as all are fallen in Adam. Indeed, not only are we fallen in Adam, but each of us is a purposeful sinner (Rom 3). The fact that any go to heaven is all of loving grace (Eph 2:8-10). Christ, BEFORE the foundation of the world (1 Pet. 1:18-21) choose to go to the Cross for His church (Eph. 5:23). His sacrifice is for His own (John 1:13; 6:44, 65; Rom. 9:16, etc.) and them alone as the rest are “judged already” (John 3:18).
While reprobation is indeed very sad to contemplate, it is also very true. I am thankful that I am saved.

-----------------------
Truth invites scrutiny, only error fears close examination. ~ Atruro Azurdia
IP: --   

Sin Nature
eternally-gratefull
Group: Elite Member
Posts: 292
Status:
Quote From : ronathanedwards March 16, 2010, 3:13 pm




Next, let us look at the question itself: “How can a loving God knowingly create a person that he knows will reject Him and therefore spend eternity in Hell?”

First, the Scripture states:

Romans 9:11-23 Yet, before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad—in order that God's purpose in election might stand: not by works but by him who calls—she was told, "The older will serve the younger."Just as it is written: "Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated." What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all! For he says to Moses, "I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion."



You do understand God was talking about nations here (Isreal and Edom) and not the eternal salvation of either one of the twins souls??

this is not saying God chose to condemn one to hell and save the other, It in context is saying he chose to bless isreal, and not bless Edom..
Quote From : ronathanedwards March 16, 2010, 3:13 pm


It does not, therefore, depend on man's desire or effort, but on God's mercy. For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: "I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth." Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden. One of you will say to me:



You do understand God did not force Pharoah to do what he did don't you? he chose to put him in power because he knew pharoah would harden his heart. which he did exactly as God knew he would.

again you took this completely out of context.

Quote From : ronathanedwards March 16, 2010, 3:13 pm

"Then why does God still blame us? For who resists his will?" But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? "Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, 'Why did you make me like this?' "Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for noble purposes and some for common use?


You do believe in looking at the to see what Paul was quoting to get context don't you?

Jeremiah 18:1–11 (NKJV)The Potter and the Clay18 The word which came to Jeremiah from the Lord, saying: 2 “Arise and go down to the potter’s house, and there I will cause you to hear My words.” 3 Then I went down to the potter’s house, and there he was, making something at the wheel. 4 [b]And the vessel that he made of clay was marred in the hand of the potter; so he made it again into another vessel, as it seemed good to the potter to make. [/b]5 Then the word of the Lord came to me, saying: 6 “O house of Israel, can I not do with you as this potter?” says the Lord. “Look, as the clay is in the potter’s hand, so are7 The instant I speak concerning a nation and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, to pull down, and to destroy it, 8 if that nation against whom I have spoken turns from its evil, I will relent of the disaster that I thought to bring upon it. 9 And the instant I speak concerning a nation and concerning a kingdom, to build and to plant it, 10 if it does evil in My sight so that it does not obey My voice, then I will relent concerning the good with which I said I would benefit it. you in My hand, O house of Israel! 11 “Now therefore, speak to the men of Judah and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, saying, ‘Thus says the Lord: “Behold, I am fashioning a disaster and devising a plan against you. Return now every one from his evil way, and make your ways and your doings good.” ’

As you see in context ( bolded text) the first thing the potter made became ruined. God did not ruin it. It did it itself., So god destroyed it and made it new. Context shows what God meant, If they turn God will make relent on his plan to destroy them and start over, if they sin, God will destroy them and start over.
The whole context is isreal. not salvation,
Quote From : ronathanedwards March 16, 2010, 3:13 pm

In Paul’s answer, I observe that God is sovereign and He has a right to do as He wills in all the earth (1 Chron. 16:14; Isa. 55:11). This is the truth of the situation. Think of it like this: Do you tell your boss who to hire and fire if you are just a janitor? Of course not! Neither does anyone tell God whom to save. It is not even proper to ask the question, which Paul emphasizes saying, “But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? "Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, 'Why did you make me like this?'”



You do know that romans 9 was written to defend Gods chosing of isreal do you not? there is no context of salvation, it is him defending and proving God was right in chosing isreal, even though isreal rejected him..

either way. Nothing you posted showed how I was wrong in my origional statement

Quote From : ronathanedwards March 16, 2010, 3:13 pm

Second, this question assumes error. The question assumes that all created persons are innocent and not worthy of judgment.



Do WHAT?? Dude if you can not even understand the question. how are you going to answer.

It does not assume anything but the fact that God has a guilty person standing in front of him, and God says he is eternally condemned because he did not believe in Christ.'

just like he had a guilty person stand in front of him, and says he will spend eternity with Christ because he believed in Christ.

Both are sinners. and both are guilty!!

According to you. God never gave the first guy chance to believe, because he did not chose him..thus he is condemning the pertson to hell for something he never allowed, or gave the person a chance to do.. Guiult is not the question at all..



now try again...


IP: --   

Sin Nature
Divinesoteriology
Group: Administrator
Posts: 487
Status:

Ordo Solutis) Drawing, Faith, Union with Christ which entails Justification, Regeneration, Adoption
RonE...

Again I would love to hear your understanding of the text at hand.

I am taking the simply usage ( he enlightens, illuminates) everyman. Tell me what is the purpose of this illumination ?

It seems proper to look at the immediate context, to understand what the authors point of illumination ties with

John 1:9–13 (ESV) — 9 The true light, which enlightens everyone, was coming into the world. 10 He was in the world, and the world was made through him, yet the world did not know him. 11 He came to his own, and his own people did not receive him. 12 But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God, 13 who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God.

Clearly the context (as I said before) concerns evangelism and salvation. Thus this illumination concerns salvation. As you know a paragraph has a subject. Each sentence within the paragraph work to convey the subject. The subject of the paragraph concerns salvation. Thus the sentence within the paragraph does also. This is simple...



-----------------------
Faith is not knowing what the future holds, but knowing who holds the future.
IP: --   

« Previous    Next »

Threaded Mode | Tell a friend | Print  

2


Jump To :


Users viewing this topic
1 guests, 0 users.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is September 9, 2010, 1:39 am.

  Powered By AEF 1.0.8 © 2007-2008 Electron Inc.Queries: 11  |  Page Created In:0.127

Caughtup Ministries