Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register  


You are here: Index > General > General > Topic : Calvary Chapel and the doctrines of grace

4


Threaded Mode | Tell a friend | Print  

Calvary Chapel and the doctrines of grace
DoctrinesofGraceBapt
Group: Member
Posts: 118
Status:
Quote From : Divinesoteriology July 25, 2010, 8:13 pm
Quote
1.
If what happens in time and space are not contingent on God's choice,
then God is not free in any way, shape, or form.
You have a God who is
not God. He can do nothing. He is completely powerless. You are in
essence denying God's omnipotence in light of his omniscience. Frankly,
I would just drop your overly simplistic view of God and his
omniscience because it is essentially flawed. How can this be correct?
God's choices do affect reality. They don't just happen to coincide
with what he already knew would happen in reality. Otherwise, God is
not powerful at ALL.




First, this has nothing to do with any points that are made thus far. What happens in space and time ? Are we not talking about your point when you said


"But, that does not mean the content of that knowledge is not contingent on God's choice."

We are talking about the content of Gods knowledge being contingent. In so way shape or form is the content of Gods knowledge contingent. All things God knows he knows eternally. God is an eternal being, therefore what he knows cannot be contingent(subservient) (limited). Frankly your argument is a non sequitur. It does not stem from the premises. At least that is my perspective. Your job would be to prove how your argument is true and his knowledge not be limited at the same time. Not whether God is free.


Umm? That which happens in space and time IS that which God's foreknows.

They are the same thing. If what God foreknows cannot be contingent on God's choice, then nothing that happens in history can be contingent on God's Choice. Remember, this is all a reductio ad absurdum. Your argument contradicts other things you believe. That is my point.

It is not non sequitur. It is intimately relevant to the argument you are giving.

Yes, what God knows he knows eternally, but what he eternally knows is logically contingent on his choice to create and govern it that "occurred" in eternity past. Remember, God in eternity past decreed the ends from the beginning along with all the means. This decree forms the basis for God action in time and space. What happens in time and space is at least affected if not completely determined by God's decree, depending on one's perspective. These things that happen in time are known by God fully from all eternity. Both are from eternity, so the only question remaining is which concept is logically contingent on the other?. And, your current answer leaves God powerless to affect anything by his own choice.

BTW, how has anything I have said limited anything about God? There is no limitation at all in anything I have presented. Frankly, you bring up this supposed limitation seems to be nothing but an unjustified assertion. I see no connection at all between events in time being contingent on God's choice and a limitation of God's foreknowledge of those events. What are you talking about? Your perspective empties God's decree from having any affect in time, but I must present why my perspective doesn't limit God when I cannot see any reason why anyone would believe that my perspective would limit God. Why?


Quote
Quote
2.This
argument stands or falls on the assumption that that which is foreknown
is indistinguishably connected to God's ability to know. If what
happens in time is not distinguished from God's ability to know what
happens in time, then what happens in time is part of, or subsumed by,
the infinite God. Time, existence, and us are all part of that which
God foreknows. Therefore, we are part of God's foreknowledge and part
of God. This is pantheism. We end up being necessary. Either, you are
correct in this argument and Pantheism is true, or you are incorrect
and your argument against God's choice determining the content of his
foreknowledge is irrelevant. This argument against God's will
determining the content of God's foreknowledge is proven incorrect by
reductio ad absurdum.


A created being cannot be a necessary being in essence. If God know that we exist then, yes it is true that we necessarily exist. If it were not true then Gods knowledge would be flawed, and he would not be God. All things that God knows will happen will necessarily happen. All things that God does not know will happen will not necessarily happen. We our contingent upon God, therefore there is no way we can be necessary we are contingent beings. In him we live move and have our being.  Your statement was that the content of Gods knowledge is contingent. So instead of defending your position you attempt to throw my argument off and (pantheism). Pantheism teaches that God is all, and all is God. We are part of Gods knowledge and his plan, that does not make us God. To say it as humbly as I can, that is the worst attempt I have seen coming from you attempting to defend your position. Let me give you a definition of pantheism from another authority other then myself.

"According to pantheism, God “is all in all.” God pervades all things, contains all things, subsumes all things, and is found within all things. Nothing exists apart from God, and all things are in some way identified with God. The world is God, and God is the world. But more precisely, in pantheism all is God, and God is all."

Norman L. Geisler, Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics, Baker reference library (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books, 1999), 580.

So where did I say that we were God ? Your pantheism argument has many logical fallacies. How about dealing with my exact words instead of trying to take them to the logical conclusion. It is better if you start with the basic then work up to the logical conclusion. I said we are contingent on God that means we are not necessary beings therefore we are not God.

If the contents of what God knows is contingent, then he has a limited knowledge. If God has a limited knowledge, then he is does not have eternal knowledge, and he would not be God.  Simple deduction.


Of course, a created being cannot be a necessary being in essence, but such an assertion is related to a theistic worldview. I was showing how your argument was nonsense sense it led to pantheism when you were a theist. Obviously, you didn't understand my argument.

If that which is foreknown is indistinguishable from God's ability to know it, then that which is foreknown is subsumed into that which is God. Everything is known by God so everything is subsumed by God. Ergo Pantheism. You asserted pantheism without even realizing it.

Frankly, this whole argument was to point out that one MUST distinguish between that which is foreknown and God's ability to foreknow. If this is done, then pantheism is not asserted and the basis for your argument has been rejected. If this is not done, then pantheism is asserted, and your argument holds water. That means your in between a rock and a hard place.

Why are you asserting that you reject pantheism? I already know your not a pantheist. It is a reductio ad absurdum. You don't need to reject that your not a pantheist, that obvious. You need to reject that the conclusion of your argument leads to pantheism. Asserting that your not a pantheist only shows your inconsistency or inability to interact with a reductio ad absurdum.

You said
Quote
If the contents of what God knows is contingent, then he has a limited knowledge.
WHY? At this point, this is a simple assertion without justification. Why? What limits God's knowledge? It is still from eternity to eternity. It is still exhaustive in every respect. What limitation exists? If the first point of a syllogism fails, then that does not bode well for the argument.


Quote
Quote
3.
Limited knowledge? Really? We are talking about logical associations in
eternity past. Such statements are absurd in light of when this takes
place, because there was never a time that God did not know everything
there is to know, and there was never a time in which everything that
would happened in time was not determined by God's will. These are two
true FACTS of Scripture, and your hypotheses of coincidence is
ridiculous in light that it denies God the power to affect time and
space. The only reasonable way to understand these two truths is that
there is a logical connection between that which God knows and that
which God decrees. God's decree determines what will occurs in history
and therefore God's decree determines what God foreknows would happen
in history. Every other theory is fundamentally flawed



Have you looked at the definition of contingent lately ? How can the content of what God believes be dependent ? Again what about those things that are possibilities. How can the content of Gods knowledge is contingent and him still know those things ? In short your view limits Gods knowledge.



WHAT?
Really, what are you talking about? The content is dependent only on What God choose to do in time. This occurred in eternity past so there is no problem. God's choice to miraculously give life to Isaac affected the course of time, thus affecting what God knew would take place in time. If God's choice to act in time was not logically prior to God's knowledge of his own actions in time, then either God's choice just happened to be the same as what he knew would happen or God is enslaved by his own foreknowledge of his own actions. Which is it? You have three options, and just citing scripture without answering the question is a copout.
God Bless
IP: --   

Calvary Chapel and the doctrines of grace
ForAllTruth
Group: Member
Posts: 11
Status:
I think I can shed some light on what our non-Calvinist (specifially he is a Molinist it seems) view is.

When he speaks of God knowing all things he is including all the things GOD DIDN'T decree (an infinite number of things).  God would have to have (in this worldview) intimate knowledge of all things NOT decreed as well as all things ACTUALLY decreed.  The concept is that God looked over all the infinite possiblities and actuated the world that best suited him.  We see that as a cosmic dice roll (as Calvinists).  The Molinist sees it as loving god picking the best world he could find.  Apparently, one that best fits his desires.  It is kind of like us choosing a meal off of an infinitely large menu, it seems.
IP: --   

Calvary Chapel and the doctrines of grace
DoctrinesofGraceBapt
Group: Member
Posts: 118
Status:
Quote From : ForAllTruth July 26, 2010, 4:48 am
I think I can shed some light on what our non-Calvinist (specifially he is a Molinist it seems) view is.

When he speaks of God knowing all things he is including all the things GOD DIDN'T decree (an infinite number of things).  God would have to have (in this worldview) intimate knowledge of all things NOT decreed as well as all things ACTUALLY decreed.  The concept is that God looked over all the infinite possiblities and actuated the world that best suited him.  We see that as a cosmic dice roll (as Calvinists).  The Molinist sees it as loving god picking the best world he could find.  Apparently, one that best fits his desires.  It is kind of like us choosing a meal off of an infinitely large menu, it seems.


It would be easier, if he was a modalist. I can respect that perspective more than I can respect what DivineSoteriology is currently presenting. He is not following the lead of William Lane Craig at this point; he is following the lead of Norman Geisler. Norman Geisler tends to over emphasize the simplicity of the Divine nature. From natural theology, Geisler defines God as simple. A fair enough deduction, if one keeps the concept within its well defined limitations, but Geisler applies God's simplicity in order to explain the relationship between God's foreknowledge and God's eternal decree that providentially determines reality. In doing so, Geisler essentially denies God's choice is free. In his writings, Geisler simply asserts that God's choice is in accordance with his foreknowledge. So basically, from this perspective God chooses things, but those choices are always in accordance with his foreknowledge. Again, a fair quotation from scripture, but underneath this scriptural reference is an interpretation that denies God the ability to act as he see fit to form the course of history. God can only act as he always foresaw that he would act. God is a slave whose choice does not affect what must necessarily occur in time by the foreknowledge of God. I am not sure if I am explaining this well, but I see a serious deficiency in this perspective of divine foreknowledge.
God Bless.
IP: --   

Calvary Chapel and the doctrines of grace
DoctrinesofGraceBapt
Group: Member
Posts: 118
Status:
Ariandgabe
Sorry, I didn't get back to you sooner.
You said
Quote From : ariandgabe July 22, 2010, 2:03 pm
Once saved always saved has haunted me for a long time, and your kind answer still bothers me.

Matt 18:13-14
13 When he finds it, I tell you, he feels far happier over this one sheep than over the ninety-nine that did not get lost. 14 In just the same way your Father in heaven does not want any of these little ones to be lost.
TEV


Now why would our Father in heaven worry of any of us getting lost if He knows that is impossible? I mean who could take any of us out of Gods hands? No one.


I won't quote others as an authority that you must accept. I will only reference Scripture as the authority you must accept. I may in the future cite other things to define what the historical issues are, but you should never take any of those citations as obligatory, required to be believed or followed.

To your questions:
1. The Father doesn't worry about anything. God determined the ends from the beginning. History is HIS STORY. All things work out according to the good pleasure of his will. This is who God is. There is nothing in time that God does not know will occur from eternity past. God possesses 100% perfect foreknowledge of everything that will ever happen in time, and there is no way God can ever be wrong about anything that happens in history. (cf. Eph. 1:5, 11b; Is. 46:10 etc.)

In light of this knowledge, how can God be worried about anything?

2. Your interpretation of Matt. 18:13-14 did not take into consideration the literary type of Scripture. This is a parable. It is a story meant to teach a certain concept to those who are listening to it. Parable are analogies that only apply as they were designed to apply by the speaker of the parable. The purpose of this parable is easily discovered because v14 interprets the parable for us. This parable is describing, by analogy, God's unwillingness to lose any of those who are his. But, given that it is a parable, one cannot apply it beyond what the author intended. Jesus in this parable is not teaching that one can lose their salvation, therefore one cannot apply this parable to teach one can lose their salvation. In essence, the analogy begin presented in the parable breaks down before one can justify the ability to lose salvation from this text.

3. Given that God is the Sovereign of the Universe who always gets what he wants (Is. 46:10; Ps. 115:3; 135:6 etc.), how can you assume he is powerless to keep saved those he does not want to lose? If anything, given who God is, this verse supports eternal security. God will not allow any to be lost, and neither will Christ. (cf. John 10:27-30)


Quote
With this said, please look at the next verse;

John 17:12
12 While I was with them in the world, I kept them in Your name. Those whom You gave Me I have kept; and none of them is lost except the son of perdition, that the Scripture might be fulfilled.
NKJV


There is that “except” there, which means there IS an exception to those saved.


I don't see how this text helps your perspective?
1. Jesus admits that he lost none.
2. BTW, you do know what "perdition" means? Judas, the son of perdition, was never a child of God. He was always a child of the Devil, a child of hell. Jesus goes over this with the Jews in John 8. Those who follow Abraham are Children of Abraham, and Children of God (John 1:12-13). Those who do not believe and walk in sin are Children of the Devil. In other word, since Judas was the son of Perdition, he was never a son of God, and since Judas was never a child of God, then he was never a Christian. Ergo, Judas never lost his salvation; Judas was never saved.
3. This was to fulfill prophecy. This was part of God's plan forever. How can the loss of one who was prophesied to not be saved be considered a proof text for the ability of one to lose their salvation.
4. This is Judas. It is somewhat a special case.


Quote

Rev 2:5-6
5 Remember therefore from where you have fallen; repent and do the first works, or else I will come to you quickly and remove your lampstand from its place — unless you repent.
NKJV


Here again, a warning to those ‘saved’ who have fallen; “repent, … or else”.


This is a commandment to a Church. What does it mean for a Church's lampstand to be removed from its place? This passage does not speak to the destruction of individual Christians in hell, but it refers to the destruction of a Church in a certain town. Since individuals are not in view here, this passage does not relate to the issue of eternal security at all.

Quote
I know you know that we are saved NOT by works, but by faith. I read you guys arguments and they all make sense, but are not concrete. We Christians MUST have a concrete answer to EVERY question we have regarding our salvation. “Seek and you shall find” is not a maybe, it is a positive concrete answer.


Not to be argumentative but, why must a Christian have a concrete answer to every question? Yes, I see how you cleverly saw how God promised answers to people who simply asked. But, obtaining an answer is not the same thing as being able to give a concrete answer to every question. What makes God's reply concrete? What verse promises every answer to every question concerning salvation RIGHT NOW? It does say seek and you will find, but it doesn't say seek and you will find an answer RIGHT NOW. God does give answers. He answers us with what we need to know when we need it, but no more. Remember, Job searched for answers to his problems, but he was never given the concrete answer found in Job 1. All Job was given was YOU HAVE NO RIGHT to QUESTION or DEMAND ANY KNOWLEDGE FROM GOD. God is God, and you are not.

God does graciously gives knowledge and understanding as he sees fit, but he never promises a concrete answer to every question concerning salvation.


Quote
John 6:37-40
“All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out.”


Of course not for this is reassurance of Jesus our Sheppard who is not like the Pope and other so called ‘spiritual leaders of our time’. He will stay with us when the wolf comes. Why would we worry about the wolf unless he could harm and even kill us? As long as we stay in the Good Sheppard’s view, His protection will always be there. But we better beware in wondering off too much, for one of these days that wolf will get us!


I find it funny that you call Jesus a Good Shepherd and then describe him as derelict in his duty as a shepherd. A Good Shepherd does not lose any sheep. A Good Shepherd does not let his sheep fall into serious harm. A Good Shepherd won't let the stupid sheep wonder to far off. Frankly, your description of a shepherd and sheep is naively wrong. Sheep are not stubborn. Sheep are stupid, but they follow. Good shepherds don't loose sight of their flock. They keep their flock safe. We may be harmed by wolves or lions in our life when we stupidly stray away, but Jesus will never let us down. He will secure us with all the Power of God. Remember, NO ONE IS ABLE TO TAKE THEM OUT OF MY FATHER'S HAND. I believe that would include the stupidity of the sheep itself.

Quote
Salvation; “It is a gift”
We didn’t earn it, we didn’t buy it for it was given to us, but we CAN throw it away! If we don’t value this gift above everything we believe in, above everything we have (like the collector that found the pearl of a great value), it becomes less and less important and we eventually loose it. This gift must be valued above even our lives, and with Jesus looking over us, we can never loose it by some accident, or can anyone take it away from us. But as I said, we can loose heart and forget its value. We can forget the price Jesus paid to get it, and then simply throw it in some corner and forget about it. Once it becomes of no value to us, it vanishes for it is a Spiritual gift. And if we cannot value it, we won’t look for it again;


What makes you think one can throw away their salvation? One is either a goat or a sheep. How can one choose not to be a sheep and become a goat? Remember, we are the adoptive sons of God. How can a person simply choose not to be adopted by someone else? They may walk away for a time, i.e. fall into a ditch, but that does not make them not a son; it doesn't turn them into a goat. You need to prove one can throw away salvation before you make such assertions.

Quote
Heb 6:4-8
4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,
5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,

6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.
7 For the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God:
8 But that which beareth thorns and briers is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned.
KJV


You need to be careful when applying this passage. Yes, Heb. 6 does seem to imply that one can lose their salvation, but if one can lose their salvation, then it proves one who has lost their salvation is forever condemned to hell fire without any hope. Make sure you realize all the implications of this text before you apply it to prove one can lose their salvation.

1. If you look at the wider context of this passage, you will find the writer of Hebrews chastising the readers for being immature and "laying again a foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God" Heb. 6:1b. He then presents Heb. 6:4-8. v9 says "Though we speak in this way, yet in your case, beloved, we feel sure of better things—things that belong to salvation."

The context of this passage is that some men were immature and believing that they lost their salvation and needed to be saved all over again. To refute this understanding, the author presents a true conditional statement in v4-8, if one loses their salvation, then they can never be saved again, and the author declares they are still saved in v9. Given, v4-9 one must assume these particular Christians never lost their salvation. How does this prove one can lose their salvation again? The author is using this statement to justify that some didn't lose their salvation.

2. v4-8 is essentially a conditional statement, if you lose your salvation, then you cannot be saved again. Such statements are referred to in logic as conditionals. The first part, the if part, is called the hypotheses, and the second is the called the conclusion. It is important to note that a conditional can be true even if it is impossible for the hypotheses to be true. In other words, the statement "if you lose your salvation, then you cannot be saved again" does not imply one can lose their salvation. Nothing in logic demands such a conclusion.

3. Hebrews 6:9-20 is also one of the most encouraging expositions in Scripture assuring the salvation of those who are in Christ. Jesus as our forerunner is especially powerful image of our security in Christ.


Quote
Look at the parable about the Prodigals Son, the son went astray, he was lost, but it was HE that had to make that turning choice, the father did not go hunting after him in the swine pen.


You keep on missing the point of these parables. The point of the parable of the Prodigal son is one is a son no matter what he has done; God will always forgive and accept those who are his sons. How can a story about forgiveness speak to man's ability to lose salvation. Is this what Jesus was teaching in this parable? No. Therefore, this parable does not teach one can lose their salvation. If anything, this parable speaks to our continued security as sons even if we stray away for some time. We never lose our salvation no matter what we do.

Quote
The parable about the Good Shepherd going after the lost sheep (Luke 15:4) resembles this one, but that one is talking about Jesus, not us. How Jesus would not  just watch a Christian wonder off and not go after him. It describes what kind of Shepherd He is, and how He comes and calls us from our lost state and summons us back into His arms. I attest to that parable, and know how Christ kept calling me and making me feel guilty till I turned back to Him.


1. This parable shows the joy of God the Father saving his sheep; it is not describing how Jesus acts as a shepherd. Jesus is not the shepherd in this parable. This parable is comparing a shepherd's joy in saving his sheep to God's joy in saving a person.

2. This parable is not about the Good Shepherd.

Quote
Now this is what could happen to any of us, and this is the message of Christ to warn us. Why warn us if it is impossible to loose our salvation? Most of the NT is to Christians, NOT the unbelieving. It is warning after warning to us not to ‘fall away’ to a point where we will no longer hear the Sheppard’s call.

How?


Now this is a good question. I already answered it in a previous comment, but that is okay.

Whether someone is truly saved is somewhat an open question. Man's ability to deceive himself and other's is outstanding. There are many people who look and act like Christians but are not, living in and among those who are truly saved. The warnings are to those false Christians who never truly trusted in Christ, those who are just deceiving themselves and those around them to the truth of their salvation. The parable of the weeds directly speaks to this reality. And, 1 John 2:19 speaks to the fact that those who leave the community of believers were NEVER SAVED. If all those who truly leave the community were never saved, then who is it that loses their salvation?

Quote
Rom 8:6-11
6 To be controlled by human nature results in death; to be controlled by the Spirit results in life and peace. 7 And so a person becomes an enemy of God when he is controlled by his human nature; for he does not obey God's law, and in fact he cannot obey it. 8 Those who obey their human nature cannot please God.

9 But you do not live as your human nature tells you to; instead, you live as the Spirit tells you to — if, in fact, God's Spirit lives in you. Whoever does not have the Spirit of Christ does not belong to him. 10 But if Christ lives in you, the Spirit is life for you because you have been put right with God, even though your bodies are going to die because of sin. 11 If the Spirit of God, who raised Jesus from death, lives in you, then he who raised Christ from death will also give life to your mortal bodies by the presence of his Spirit in you.
TEV


Look: “To be controlled by human nature results in death”, that goes for us Christians too. Physical death is NOT the end result of our punishment. Eternal damnation IS.

Rom 8:12-13
12 So then, my brothers, we have an obligation, but it is not to live as our human nature wants us to. 13 For if you live according to your human nature, you are going to die; but if by the Spirit you put to death your sinful actions, you will live.

TEV

In Jesus name
Odon (ariandgabe)


How did you get this so confused? Romans 8:6-13 is not talking about how those currently led by the Spirit can chose to be led by the flesh and thus be condemned. It is simply comparing and contrasting what the saved and unsaved lives look like. Such declarations do not imply anything to the question of losing one's salvation. They just explain how to see if someone is truly saved.

BTW, How did you cite Romans 8:6-13 and forget about v29-39. Talk about a passage that teaches eternal security.
Quote
For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.

What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us? He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, how will he not also with him graciously give us all things? Who shall bring any charge against God's elect? It is God who justifies. Who is to condemn? Christ Jesus is the one who died—more than that, who was raised—who is at the right hand of God, who indeed is interceding for us. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword? As it is written,

“For your sake we are being killed all the day long;
we are regarded as sheep to be slaughtered.”

No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. For I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Romans 8:29-39


I honestly don't think Paul could have made his teachings more clear. Those God foreknew, God predestined, called, justified, and will glorify. Paul then exclaims how ridiculous it is think anything could separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord, ie. salvation. He goes on for 8 verses, ending with NOR ANYTHING ELSE IN ALL OF CREATION. I am part of creation. How can I, part of creation, separate myself from salvation, if nothing in creation can separate us from being saved? This is a truly devastating passage to those who believe one can lose their salvation.


God Bless
IP: --   

Calvary Chapel and the doctrines of grace
Divinesoteriology
Group: Administrator
Posts: 485
Status:

Ordo Solutis) Drawing, Faith, Union with Christ which entails Justification, Regeneration, Adoption
"Umm? That which happens in space and time IS that which God's foreknows.
"

Wrong. God foreknows all things, not just what happens in space and time. So to make the statement the it IS, is fundamentally incorrect.

"They are the same thing. If what God foreknows cannot be contingent
on God's choice, then nothing that happens in history can be contingent
on God's Choice. Remember, this is all a reductio ad absurdum. Your
argument contradicts other things you believe. That is my point."


They are not the same things because somethings that God foreknows will not occur, therefore his knowledge is not contingent on what will actually happen. This is what I have been trying to get across, hopefully I put it in simpler terms this time. I apologize for not being able to articulate well enough, my point.This is why I said that you make his knowledge limited.

"
It is not non sequitur. It is intimately relevant to the argument you are giving."

No, it is non sequitur. I am talking about an attribute of God, you started talking about what happens in space and time. God knows more then what happens in space and time.


Quote
Yes, what God knows he knows eternally, but what he eternally knows
is logically contingent on his choice to create and govern it that
"occurred" in eternity past. Remember, God in eternity past decreed the
ends from the beginning along with all the means. This decree forms the
basis for God action in time and space. What happens in time and space
is at least affected if not completely determined by God's decree,
depending on one's perspective. These things that happen in time are
known by God fully from all eternity. Both are from eternity, so the
only question remaining is which concept is logically contingent on the
other?. And, your current answer leaves God powerless to affect
anything by his own choice.




The argument is flawed, namely for the reason that God knows more then he decrees. If his knowledge is contingent on what he sovereignly decrees, then it necessarily follows that he does not know what he does not decree, since his knowledge is contingent on his decree.

Secondly, I would like to note that it is fundementally flawed from a scriptural perspective. Romans 8 has a logical priority concerning the order of salvation. Notice how foreknowlege comes before predestination. Sproul notes this in his commentary, and he agree's that foreknowlege must come first.

"God predestines persons that are known to him. Therefore, it is a logical necessity that foreknowledge of the people comes before predestination. "

R. C. Sproul, The Gospel of God: An Exposition of Romans (Great Britain: Christian Focus Publications., 1994), 152.

In his commentary he is discussing the prescience view and showing why it is flawed, an argument I agree with. I dont hold to the catholic, arminian prescience view so I agree with his polemics against it. I dont fully agree with Sprouls view on it either. It is flawed also, that is why I am taking the middle ground on this. He seems to present a false dilema in his commentary as though there is no other salution. Either the augustinian view or the arminian view. I believe they are both flawed.

But back to our discussion...

The answer is Gods soveriegnty is not contingent on his knoweldge, and his knowlege is not contingent on his sovereignty, but they are both in harmony with eachother. It is also not a roll of the dice view, there is another perspective, not just the two you presented.



"BTW, how has anything I have said limited anything about God? There
is no limitation at all in anything I have presented. Frankly, you
bring up this supposed limitation seems to be nothing but an
unjustified assertion. I see no connection at all between events in
time being contingent on God's choice and a limitation of God's
foreknowledge of those events. What are you talking about? Your
perspective empties God's decree from having any affect in time, but I
must present why my perspective doesn't limit God when I cannot see any
reason why anyone would believe that my perspective would limit God.
Why?

"

Hopefully I explained myself fully earlier...
Blessings















-----------------------
Faith is not knowing what the future holds, but knowing who holds the future.
IP: --   

Calvary Chapel and the doctrines of grace
Divinesoteriology
Group: Administrator
Posts: 485
Status:

Ordo Solutis) Drawing, Faith, Union with Christ which entails Justification, Regeneration, Adoption
Quote From : ForAllTruth July 26, 2010, 4:48 am
I think I can shed some light on what our non-Calvinist (specifially he is a Molinist it seems) view is.

When he speaks of God knowing all things he is including all the things GOD DIDN'T decree (an infinite number of things).  God would have to have (in this worldview) intimate knowledge of all things NOT decreed as well as all things ACTUALLY decreed.  The concept is that God looked over all the infinite possiblities and actuated the world that best suited him.  We see that as a cosmic dice roll (as Calvinists).  The Molinist sees it as loving god picking the best world he could find.  Apparently, one that best fits his desires.  It is kind of like us choosing a meal off of an infinitely large menu, it seems.



I hardly have a molinist view of Gods omniscience. Infact here is an argument against molinism

"This objection poses a problem for molinists (see Craig, OWG, 127–52), but not for thomists (see Volume 1, chapter 8). Luis de Molina (1535–1600) insisted that God’s decisions are based on what He foreknows will actually occur, should He choose to create that kind of world—this is dependent knowledge. However, classical theists hold:
(1)      God does not really have foreknowledge; He simply knows in one eternal Now.
(2)      God’s knowledge is not based on anything outside Himself. God’s knowledge of all things is based on knowing Himself and all other things as they preexist in Himself as their Primary Cause.
The basic argument in favor of the classical theist’s view goes like this:
(1)      God is an independent Being.
(2)      God’s knowledge is identical to His Being (since He is simple).
(3)      Hence, God’s knowledge is independent.
If this is so, then the belief that God has dependent knowledge (as in molinism) is false. All His knowledge must be part of His independent Being; that is, He must know everything in and through Himself and not through anything that is contingent."


Norman L. Geisler, Systematic Theology, Volume Two: God, Creation (Minneapolis, MN: Bethany House Publishers, 2003), 207.

It seems the Doctrinesofgracebaptist is coming very close to this category
. However, he is not a molinist either.


Edited by Divinesoteriology : July 26, 2010, 9:17 pm

-----------------------
Faith is not knowing what the future holds, but knowing who holds the future.
IP: --   

Calvary Chapel and the doctrines of grace
DoctrinesofGraceBapt
Group: Member
Posts: 118
Status:
Quote From : Divinesoteriology July 26, 2010, 8:43 pm
"Umm? That which happens in space and time IS that which God's foreknows.
"

Wrong. God foreknows all things, not just what happens in space and time. So to make the statement the it IS, is fundamentally incorrect.


Yes, God's knowledge/omniscience includes more than that which happens in space and time, but knowledge can not properly be call foreknowledge, if the thing being known is itself eternal. If something known by God is outside of time and space, then it is simply known by God; it is not foreknown by God. The prefix "fore" means something.

Even if one accepts your sloppy use of the term foreknowledge, you must agree that that which happens in time is part of, or subsumed under, that which is foreknown. And, if that is the case, my argument still holds water with simple rewording.

Quote
"They are the same thing. If what God foreknows cannot be contingent
on God's choice, then nothing that happens in history can be contingent
on God's Choice. Remember, this is all a reductio ad absurdum. Your
argument contradicts other things you believe. That is my point."


They are not the same things because somethings that God foreknows will not occur, therefore his knowledge is not contingent on what will actually happen. This is what I have been trying to get across, hopefully I put it in simpler terms this time. I apologize for not being able to articulate well enough, my point.This is why I said that you make his knowledge limited.


I will admit that I am limiting what I am referring to in God's knowledge, but I have never denied, at least on purpose, that God could not principle know more that what I have been referring too. God knows all sorts of things, but part of his infallible knowledge is what will and what will not occur in time and space, including all of God's own actions in time and the creation of time itself. If God's choice was not involved in determining what is known to actually occur in time, then that which is known by God to occur in time, which is everything, is outside of God's Sovereign Authority.

Frankly, I see no basis for God having any ability choose and act in time within your framework. And, that means God's ceases to be a personal agent.

BTW, I am not saying that everything that God knows is determined by God's choice. I am saying all things that are contingent are contingent on his choice, and if God's knowledge of these things is such that it is determined logically prior to God freely choosing to act, then again God didn't choose to act; God is a slave to his own knowledge of his own actions.

Quote
"It is not non sequitur. It is intimately relevant to the argument you are giving."

No, it is non sequitur. I am talking about an attribute of God, you started talking about what happens in space and time. God knows more then what happens in space and time.


Quote
Yes, what God knows he knows eternally, but what he eternally knows
is logically contingent on his choice to create and govern it that
"occurred" in eternity past. Remember, God in eternity past decreed the
ends from the beginning along with all the means. This decree forms the
basis for God action in time and space. What happens in time and space
is at least affected if not completely determined by God's decree,
depending on one's perspective. These things that happen in time are
known by God fully from all eternity. Both are from eternity, so the
only question remaining is which concept is logically contingent on the
other?. And, your current answer leaves God powerless to affect
anything by his own choice.


The argument is flawed, namely for the reason that God knows more then he decrees. If his knowledge is contingent on what he sovereignly decrees, then it necessarily follows that he does not know what he does not decree, since his knowledge is contingent on his decree.


How can God having more knowledge that is not contingent on his decree make the core of my argument invalid. I was not referring to all those things know by God that are not directly related to God's decree to create and rule time an space. I took the term foreknowledge to directly relate to only that knowledge which directly corresponds to that which happens in time. I was never arguing that all which God knows is contingent on his decree.

Quote
Secondly, I would like to note that it is fundementally flawed from a scriptural perspective. Romans 8 has a logical priority concerning the order of salvation. Notice how foreknowlege comes before predestination. Sproul notes this in his commentary, and he agree's that foreknowlege must come first.

"God predestines persons that are known to him. Therefore, it is a logical necessity that foreknowledge of the people comes before predestination. "

R. C. Sproul, The Gospel of God: An Exposition of Romans (Great Britain: Christian Focus Publications., 1994), 152.

In his commentary he is discussing the prescience view and showing why it is flawed, an argument I agree with. I dont hold to the catholic, arminian prescience view so I agree with his polemics against it. I dont fully agree with Sprouls view on it either. It is flawed also, that is why I am taking the middle ground on this. He seems to present a false dilema in his commentary as though there is no other salution. Either the augustinian view or the arminian view. I believe they are both flawed.


I inherently agree with Sproul, but the reformed concept of foreknowledge includes the concept of foreordination. Sproul sees God foreknowing Christians as the active choice of God to love certain men in a particular way. Remember, I prefaced this discussion with the statement "Assuming Foreknowledge = prescience". I was purposefully simplifying the discussion as to ignore this semantical quandary and interact with the Concepts undergirding this discussion. Therefore, Sproul's perspective is irrelevant in this discussion, because it is not working within the same definitional system.

BTW, I know you think your holding on to a middle ground, but you still need to define that middle ground. To simply assert Scripture (1 Pet. 1:1-2) without interpretation or philosophical explanation, and proclaim to be in in a middle ground between two perspectives is not good enough.

Quote
But back to our discussion...

The answer is Gods sovereignty is not contingent on his knoweldge, and his knowlege is not contingent on his sovereignty, but they are both in harmony with eachother. It is also not a roll of the dice view, there is another perspective, not just the two you presented.


But, you still need to define it in someway. If you don't, then that is fine, but you would then have no perspective to present. You are simply a skeptic of the accepted paradigms without any perspective of your own.

You do know, I know you are not really asserting that you believe God is not a personal agent? I am simply saying that your argument against the Augustinian view leads logically to God being unable to act freely in time and space. BTW, I still think your over applying the concept of the simplicity of God, but whatever.

Quote
"BTW, how has anything I have said limited anything about God? There
is no limitation at all in anything I have presented. Frankly, you
bring up this supposed limitation seems to be nothing but an
unjustified assertion. I see no connection at all between events in
time being contingent on God's choice and a limitation of God's
foreknowledge of those events. What are you talking about? Your
perspective empties God's decree from having any affect in time, but I
must present why my perspective doesn't limit God when I cannot see any
reason why anyone would believe that my perspective would limit God.
Why?

"

Hopefully I explained myself fully earlier...
Blessings



God Bless.
IP: --   

Calvary Chapel and the doctrines of grace
Divinesoteriology
Group: Administrator
Posts: 485
Status:

Ordo Solutis) Drawing, Faith, Union with Christ which entails Justification, Regeneration, Adoption
Quote
Yes,
God's knowledge/omniscience includes more than that which happens in
space and time, but knowledge can not properly be call foreknowledge,
if the thing being known is itself eternal. If something known by God
is outside of time and space, then it is simply known by God; it is not
foreknown by God. The prefix "fore" means something.



Even if one accepts your sloppy use of the term foreknowledge, you
must agree that that which happens in time is part of, or subsumed
under, that which is foreknown. And, if that is the case, my argument
still holds water with simple rewording.


In all technicality there is no foreknowledge. It is simply Gods omniscience. He knows all things at once, and he is simple, therefore his knowledge cannot be divided. Unless of course you dont believe in the simplicity of God. Therefore the argument of contingency is humorous. It denies the simplicity of God, and limits his knowledge. Wheither what God knows happens in time or it doesnt it is still the knowledge of God, and his knowledge is not contingent.


Quote

I
will admit that I am limiting what I am referring to in God's
knowledge, but I have never denied, at least on purpose, that God could
not principle know more that what I have been referring too. God knows
all sorts of things, but part of his infallible knowledge is what will
and what will not occur in time and space, including all of God's own
actions in time and the creation of time itself. If God's choice was
not involved in determining what is known to actually occur in time,
then that which is known by God to occur in time, which is everything,
is outside of God's Sovereign Authority.



Frankly, I see no basis for God having any ability choose and act
in time within your framework. And, that means God's ceases to be a
personal agent.



BTW, I am not saying that everything that God knows is determined
by God's choice. I am saying all things that are contingent are
contingent on his choice, and if God's knowledge of these things is
such that it is determined logically prior to God freely choosing to
act, then again God didn't choose to act; God is a slave to his own
knowledge of his own actions.



God is only a slave to his knowledge if his decees are based on his knowledge. However, as I have said numerous times. Gods will is not based on his knowledge, it is accord with it. It is fundemental that you dont equivcate the terms (based) and (according). You are arguing against an arminian perspective of Gods will being BASED on foreknowledge. Gods will is not BASED on foreknowledge, therefore God is not a slave, but free...



Quote



How can God having more knowledge that is not contingent on his
decree make the core of my argument invalid. I was not referring to all
those things know by God that are not directly related to God's decree
to create and rule time an space. I took the term foreknowledge to
directly relate to only that knowledge which directly corresponds to
that which happens in time. I was never arguing that all which God
knows is contingent on his decree.



Because God is simple, here let me quote some divines.

"Stephen Charnock (1628–1680)
Charnock, the great Puritan divine, held:
God is the most simple being; for that which is first in nature, having nothing beyond it, cannot by any means be thought to be compounded; for whatsoever is so, depends upon the parts whereof it is compounded, and so is not the first being: now God being infinitely simple … He being His own essence and existence. (EAG, 1:333)


He added, “Since, therefore, God is without all composition … His understanding is not distinct from His essence” (ibid., 1:328).
“God, being infinitely simple, hath nothing in himself which is not himself, and therefore cannot will any change in himself, he being his own essence and existence” (ibid., 1:333).


Therefore [it is] impossible [for God] to be diminished in any particle of his essence; nor can he be diminished by anything in his own nature, because his infinite simplicity admits of nothing distinct from himself, or contrary to himself, (ibid., 1:321)


Francis Turretin (1623–1687)
Turretin systematized the Reformation view on simplicity in these words:
The simplicity of God considered not morally, but physically, is his incommunicable attribute by which the divine nature is conceived by us not only as free from all composition and division, but also as incapable of composition and divisibility.


He argued,
(1) from his independence, because composition is of the formal reason of a being originated and dependent (since nothing can be composed by itself, but whatever is composed must necessarily be composed by another; now, God is the first and independent being, recognizing no other prior to himself); (2) from his unity, because he who is absolutely one is also absolutely simple and therefore can neither be divided nor composed; (3) from his perfection, because composition implies imperfection inasmuch as it supposes passive power, dependency and mutability; (4) from his activity, because God is a most pure act having no passive admixture and therefore rejecting all composition (because in God there is nothing which needs to be made perfect or can receive perfection from any other, but he is whatever can be and cannot be other than what he is) … He is usually described not only by concrete but also abstract names—life, light, truth, etc. (IET, 1:191–92)


William G. T. Shedd (1820–1894)
The Simplicity of God denotes that his being is uncompounded, incomplex, and indivisible: “a most pure spirit, without parts.” Simplicity does not belong to angels and men. They are complex, being composed of soul and body: two substances, not one. They are not unembodied and mere spirit. The angels, like the redeemed after the resurrection, have a spiritual body, which does not mean a body made of spirit, but one adapted to a spiritual world. A spiritual body belongs to the world of extended form, not of unextended mind. The simplicity of the Divine being is not contradictory to the trinity or his essence, because trinity does not denote three different essences, but one essence subsisting in three modes. The trinitarian distinctions no more conflict with the simplicity of the essence than do the attributes. The essence is not divided into either hypostases, or attributes. The whole essence is in each person, and in each attribute. The theory of external emanation is incompatible with the simplicity of the Divine essence. A substance which by efflux of particles can flow out into new forms, like rays from the sun, is compounded and complex. When it is said, in Romans 11:36, that “all things are of him,” it is not meant that the universe is an effluent portion of the Divine essence, but that it originates from him as its creator. When it is said, in Acts 17:29, that man is the offspring (genos) of God, it is not meant that man participates in the Divine essence, but possesses a nature similar to that of God. (DT, 339)


Herman Bavinck (1854–1921)
“Every attribute is identical with God’s being. He is what he has … When we speak about God, we must maintain that each of his attributes is identical with his being.… Whatever God is he is completely and simultaneously” (DG, 1, 121)."


Norman L. Geisler, Systematic Theology, Volume Two: God, Creation (Minneapolis, MN: Bethany House Publishers, 2003), 49-50.

So how can you say part of Gods knowledge is contingent? God does not have parts and omniscience is of Gods essense.

Quote
I
inherently agree with Sproul, but the reformed concept of foreknowledge
includes the concept of foreordination. Sproul sees God foreknowing
Christians as the active choice of God to love certain men in a
particular way. Remember, I prefaced this discussion with the statement
"Assuming Foreknowledge = prescience". I was purposefully simplifying
the discussion as to ignore this semantical quandary and interact with
the Concepts undergirding this discussion. Therefore, Sproul's
perspective is irrelevant in this discussion, because it is not working
within the same definitional system.



BTW, I know you think your holding on to a middle ground, but you
still need to define that middle ground. To simply assert Scripture (1 Pet. 1:1-2)
without interpretation or philosophical explanation, and proclaim to be
in in a middle ground between two perspectives is not good enough.



Sproul was not denying that foreknowledge is Gods omniscience, but he claimed it was more then just omnisicence. So his perspective is still applicable. So his definition of logical priority still applies here, although as I said I dont necessary agree with a priority of Gods esssence. There is a priority of how he acts in time, certain things take place first. Drawing precedes illumination, illumination precedes union, union precedes sanctification, sanctification precedes glorification. Gods first draws us etc,, he does certain things in a logical order when he acts in time.


Quote



But, you still need to define it in someway. If you don't, then
that is fine, but you would then have no perspective to present. You
are simply a skeptic of the accepted paradigms without any perspective
of your own.



You do know, I know you are not really asserting that you believe
God is not a personal agent? I am simply saying that your argument
against the Augustinian view leads logically to God being unable to act
freely in time and space. BTW, I still think your over applying the
concept of the simplicity of God, but whatever.


Your perspective makes Gods knowledge Gods essence  (omnisceince) contingent. My perspective is defined, it is logical, (non contradictory) biblical. It is a moderate calvinist perspective. Or you can say it is the reformed arminian perspective.  Whatever you want to call it that is fine. Calvinist call me arminian, Arminian call me a calvinist. I am a calminian I guess. I just accept truth and reject contradictions.



-----------------------
Faith is not knowing what the future holds, but knowing who holds the future.
IP: --   

Calvary Chapel and the doctrines of grace
ForAllTruth
Group: Member
Posts: 11
Status:
This is getting silly.  The practical question at hand is this...

Can the potter (God) do with the clay (man) anything he wants?  Making any object that he desires...  In other words could God have created a creation where every decision God made is reversed?  Specifically, regarding election, could God have sent the elect to hell and those non-elect to heaven simply based on HIS SOVEREIGN CHOICE?  That is the question.  Will everyone here answer it so that I know how HIGH and MIGHTY you see the MOST HIGH GOD?

Edited by ForAllTruth : July 28, 2010, 3:28 am
IP: --   

Calvary Chapel and the doctrines of grace
Rinnegade
Group: Member
Posts: 25
Status:
God does as he sees fit to do & as he pleases & he has no one to answer to but himself.
IP: --   

Calvary Chapel and the doctrines of grace
ForAllTruth
Group: Member
Posts: 11
Status:
It all comes down to a debate over God's Sovereignty and man's willl.

Check this out...

Exploring the Concept of Free Will
http://www.helium.com/items/1910562-free-will
IP: --   

Calvary Chapel and the doctrines of grace
ariandgabe
Group: Member
Posts: 14
Status:

Gods Spirit joins our spirit to make us His children
Quote:
Rev 2:5-6 
5 Remember therefore from where you have fallen; repent and do the first works, or else I will come to you quickly and remove your lampstand from its place — unless you repent. 
NKJV

This is a commandment to a Church. What does it mean for a Church's lampstand to be removed from its place? This passage does not speak to the destruction of individual Christians in hell, but it refers to the destruction of a Church in a certain town. Since individuals are not in view here, this passage does not relate to the issue of eternal security at all.


Matt 18:20
20 For where two or three are gathered together in My name, I am there in the midst of them."
NKJV


Thank you my dear Brother in Christ for your kind and elaborate answer, you guys continue to amaze me. Please forgive me for I am slow and I end up writing too much, so please bear with me. Please forgive the coulisses that were left from my abused upbringing.

To your comment above, I understand that the church IS the individuals. And since even a small leaven leaveneth the whole lump, 1 Cor 5:6-8 the churches are warned not to tolerate evil or any false doctrines or else they loose their salvation (lamp stand removed).

“For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that He might destroy the works of the devil.” Why, if the sheep remain sheep and the (wolves, tares) goats remain goats, what’s the use since the works of the Devil has no effect on them?

Now here is our problem (between today’s Church and Gods Word); If this in Rev. means that Jesus is warning a Church of sheep to get rid of the goats and get the sheep back in line, that would be fine. But it is clear the message is to ‘repent’.

Here is where I see things in a different light;

How can a sheep become a goat? Here is how;

“But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner — not even to eat with such a person.” 1 Cor 5:11

A sheep will never call a goat ‘brother’. This is a message from sheep to sheep, or Sheppard to sheep.

1 Cor 5:9-13

How can goats leaven all the sheep? 1 Cor 5:6-8

How can dogs become Children of the Most High? Matt 15:26-28

And yet, here you have it.

Again, a warning to sheep from turning to goats/wolves. These next verses are to the sheep; ‘Little Children’ not to be deceived. According to once-saved-always-saved you cannot deceive sheep since they are always in their Sheppard’s watch, shielded from harm and safe in the eternal arms of the Great Sheppard!

1 John 3:7-9
7 Little children, let no one deceive you. He who practices righteousness is righteous, just as He is righteous. 8 He who sins is of the devil, for the devil has sinned from the beginning.

Both sheep and goats can sin. God didn’t create men on this earth as wolves, tares, goats! The evil one did that by introducing sin in the world. God created a perfect sinless Adam and Eve. It is when they sinned that they started to die and change to goats. The first to become a wolf was Cain by killing his brother Able.

For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that He might destroy the works of the devil.
By the Son of God both blemished sheep and goats and even dogs can stop sinning, and by repenting they all become in good relation with God through Christ who saves them.

9 Whoever has been born of God does not sin, for His seed remains in him; and he cannot sin, because he has been born of God.

Do you now see?  ‘Born of God’ is the transformation back to a sinless life! ‘Born again’ from goats to sheep.

Now if you say that sheep cannot sin, beware:

1 Cor 15:33 Do not be deceived: "Evil company corrupts good habits."  If you are a ‘Once Saved Always Saved Trinitarian’ you would respond to this; ‘yeah right! I’m a sheep and can do no wrong. I can celebrate pagan holydays like Christmas with Santa and his demonic elves, the goddess Easter with her fertility bunnies and her painted eggs that represents the birth of the universe, kill my own Christian Brother in war, sue them in the Godless courts judged by Godless judges, yes, I can do anything I want, even abortion is not really a sin since it is the law. In Romans it says; I have to ‘give unto César what is Cesar’s and unto God what is Gods. The earth is Cesar’s and God ordained him as ruler, I am obliged!’

Dear Brothers in Christ, look at this and ask yourself if this next comment to sheep or to the goats?

1 John 1:8-10

It is to us all, Jew (lost-sheep) and Gentile (goats/dogs) to “confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”

Again, should a sheep fall away and turn back to his old sinful self (goat) after all the warnings, we are given this;

1 John 2:1-2

What is that; “… and not for ours only but also for the whole world”? Can Jesus turn the whole world of; wolves, goats, bad fish and tares into sheep? Yes, for we know that is why the Son of God came;

1 John 3:16-17

So, from sheep (Adam) we became goats (Cain) and went downhill to Noah where the whole world was goats and wolves and yes, dogs where God destroyed them. But after the flood things went back to their old ways, sin ruled once again.

But you know the rest, how God brought the whole world back to Himself through His Son, yes even the common like the dogs and the goats;

Acts 10:10-16

And friends, who are we to call ‘what God has cleansed common or unclean?’

And finally:

Matt 13:47-50

This sums it up. The sea is the world and the fish represents the people of the world. They all heard the message (cleansed), they all had a chance to ‘be born again’ (transformed) from being evil (goats, wolves, dogs) to a new life as good sheep. But sadly the hearts of many of them remained hardened to the cleansing and kept their traditions, their idols, their man made rules and laws, and they remained ugly and unusable fish and so the angels will separate the wicked from the just and cast them into a furnace of fire.

This is not about fish, are fish good and evil? This is about what we do, whether we become good or evil, a goat or a sheep, or become so evil that God calls us dogs and wolves. But we better change to good by repenting, so when the angels come with their net and reap the earth, we will be thrown in with the good fish and not to be burned with the wicked.

So as it is written, Adam sinned, and his son Cain sinned even more and from there man snowballed downward to a point they were no more sheep from Gods flock but became like ravening wolves, dogs wallowing in sexual immorality, lust, passion, greed, hate and murder. They became from children of God (sinless) to the children of the devil (sinful). But God planned a new rebirth for us, and through His Son Jesus Christ we can transform from even dogs to Christ’s sheep.

1 John 3:20-22

In the above verse we are not sheep because God made us to be sheep, it is because we ‘keep the commandments’.

1 John 5:18

Again, ‘born of God’ is a change from goats, dogs, sheep that are blemished to sheep without blemish and the wicked one cannot touch us.

1 John 1:6-7

See, the whole Bible is about change to good, a rebirth, then to be aware not to fall back to sin and be eaten by the serpent that dragon of old, for we are not ignorant of his ways. If from perfect Adam man can turn into goats and dogs and then through Christ become sheep again, what makes you think that we cannot regress from sheep back to that sinful nature and become Satan’s servants; dogs and wolves again? Satan would love you to think that once saved you are ‘safe’! Please Brothers in Christ don’t close your eyes and fall asleep like this, wake up and ‘hold on to, guard what you have’!!!!

1 Tim 6:19-21

If you think that we are not to fight every day a good fight to remain sheep, then you have fallen asleep a long time ago my friend and Satan already got you. Wake up!

1 Tim 6:12-16

For now till That Day of our Lord we must fight to remain sheep. As long as WE remain sheep, Jesus the Good Shepherd will keep us safe. Brother, the entire New Testament is written for us Believers, us Sheep to warn us, reminding us to beware of turning. It is NOT to unbelievers.

Jesus sent us to tell the Good News to the unbelievers so those that hearken to our voice can turn to the Bible and believe in Him who sent us. THEN and only then is the Bible to them, after they turned from dogs and goats to sheep. Jesus doesn’t keep an eye on the world, to keep them safe, but He does keep an eye on us, to keep us from danger. If there was no danger for us sheep, why all the warning?

But if you listen to man made doctrines that tell you once your in your in, and that now that you’re a Christian, you need not worry because it wasn’t your choice anyways, that it was Gods choice before the creation, and there is no way you can loose this prize, and if you believe that there is no way for a sheep to become a goat, then Satan has put you to sleep already. You are like the five Foolish Virgins who thought that their intellect instead of Gods Word will last them until Jesus comes, but realized that their intellect and their trust in men’s doctrine is not quite enough to last late into the night. The Groom tarried, and their intellect ran out of oil and when they were awakened to the Grooms coming, they panicked. Don’t let this happen to you my dear friend. Get the oil that lasts  endlessly given by the Holy Spirit and your lamp will never go out.

I have a feeling that Satan has also told you that you can fight it out with guns at Armageddon, good verses evil, and just before evil kills you, you will be raptured out of here, right?
How many great Martyrs went gloriously to their death? Dying for the Lord is the most glorious reward that can be bestowed upon a Christian. Why would God want us to shoot it out with the evil, to kill as many as we can when Jesus made it clear that we are to love those that hate and persecute us? Where do Christians get this brutal counter-attack against the army of the anti-Christ? With all the cross-fire, you are sure to kill many innocent who still have a chance to repent. But hey, we’re Christians and cannot do any wrong, and when things get rough, or when the enemy is about to capture us, Christ zaps us out of here leaving planes and cars crashing into everyone.

Makes a good book and a good action movie, and even a great PC Game, and the world loves it. But it is a deception of Satan of the worst kind. This is almost as bad as Christmas and Santa replacing Christ in Christian hearts. May God open your eyes.

“Yes Christian” Satan whispers; “you have nothing to worry about, since once you’re saved you can never loose it. Yesssss … Christians are not perfect, they’re just forgiven. So go on and live it up, have your sport idols, your American Idols, your rock-star idols, your tree idols and all the pagan idols. Hey, if they bother you a bit, just add Christ and mass to it, (both holy words) before the Tree, and presto you have a Christ-mass-tree!

You can go on killing other people in countries your President invades unfairly, even if they’re Christians. Serve your government and you shall serve God. Vote dear Christian, if nothing else, vote between two evil and ungodly President runner-ups, I mean its better to have the lesser evil to tell you you’re no more a Christian Nation, that you are no longer to mention the name Jesus in public. After all, remember that it was God who put up this government, Sadam, Bush, Hitler, Mussolini, Arafat, all Gods servants, remember? So don’t worry, your hands are clean Christian.”

Satan even says; “Hey Christian, confused when your actions contradict the Bible, no problem. Filter it through the Trinity Doctrine I gave you. You will get so confused that it won’t matter who you worship. Once you are blinded, none of that really matters anymore. Just use mumbo-jumbo like all my other ministers (not talking about you guys here, you are very intelligent and know your Bible, only you filter it through doctrines of men). Wing it and use a lot of scripture quoting, (TV Ministers) that gets them every time since everyone is afraid to go against Gods Word.”

No my friends, first we (dogs goats) gentiles are to be born again into sheep, and only then are we shepherded by Christ. This is when these verses come alive for us;

Matt 18:12-14

God loves to find lost sheep. When sheep get lost, they cry. If a sheep is headed away from the fold without crying, he’s looking for another fold with another shepherd, or is on a mission like the Prodigals son. The Shepherd will not leave the rest to go wondering aimlessly looking for I don’t know what. The sheep and the son have to make a turn back, and if he gets lost, must cry out before the Shepherd will run to it in joy. The story cannot be interpreted with any other meaning.

God bless you all, please think this through. The end is so near, the ‘abomination of desolation’ has been standing there front of the whole world, and Christians are looking for it in the future! The anti-Christ, the real deal man who claims to be in the place of God has been here for a long time too. Why are we talking and arguing about basic principles like idols, and whether we can loose our salvation or not? We are to eat meat and yet we can barely drink milk. Come on dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ, lets move on, midnight is upon us and I can hear the Bridegroom coming. Can’t you?

In Jesus name
Odon

P.S.

How can Christians be satisfied with being a Baptist, a Calvinist, a Jehovah’s Witness, Catholic and so on, and not see the danger of this division? There is ONE Church and the members be in one mind in it. When one wiser reveals something the other did not know, they all accept it with great joy, not as we have it now, saying with content: “Well, that’s how you understand it, and this is how I do, but that’s O.K. you have your views and I have mine. We all worship the same God, and that is the most important.”

NO. The Spirit teaches us all with the same understanding. There is no doctrine for the Baptists and another for the Presbyterians and another for the Catholics. We must all believe the same thing about every subject. There are no two roads that lead to Paradise, the Kingdom of God, only ONE. 1 Cor 3:1-4
IP: --   

Calvary Chapel and the doctrines of grace
DoctrinesofGraceBapt
Group: Member
Posts: 118
Status:
ariandgabe

Don’t worry about the length. Mine is longer.

I will try to respond to everything you said in the most respectful way, but I must say before I start that I disagree with your approach to justifying your position. This is called the shotgun approach to theology. If one fires off tons of verses in short order and if these verses are read quickly from a certain perspective, then they tend to justify a particular perspective. I will admit this is something everyone interacting with Scripture does from time to time, if they are not careful. The problem with this approach is it does not seriously interact with the individual verses being applied to the topic. It does not take the time to make sure the verses are actually teaching what they are being applied to teach.

Quote From : ariandgabe August 20, 2010, 8:54 pm
Quote

Rev 2:5-6 
5 Remember therefore from where you have fallen; repent and do the first works, or else I will come to you quickly and remove your lampstand from its place — unless you repent. 
NKJV

This is a commandment to a Church. What does it mean for a Church's lampstand to be removed from its place? This passage does not speak to the destruction of individual Christians in hell, but it refers to the destruction of a Church in a certain town. Since individuals are not in view here, this passage does not relate to the issue of eternal security at all.


Matt 18:20
20 For where two or three are gathered together in My name, I am there in the midst of them."
NKJV


Thank you my dear Brother in Christ for your kind and elaborate answer, you guys continue to amaze me. Please forgive me for I am slow and I end up writing too much, so please bear with me. Please forgive the coulisses that were left from my abused upbringing.

To your comment above, I understand that the church IS the individuals. And since even a small leaven leaveneth the whole lump, 1 Cor 5:6-8 the churches are warned not to tolerate evil or any false doctrines or else they loose their salvation (lamp stand removed).


First off, Matthew 18:20 does not define when Christ is among Christians or what a church is. Matthew 18:15-20 is talking about Church Discipline. Jesus' point is that when two or three are properly disciplining another in the Community of believers, then Jesus is behind them in the distribution of said discipline. No other application of this verse is reasonable.

Secondly, yes the Church is made up of individuals, but the Church is not the individuals. You need to justify that the Church is the individuals in that whatever is said to a Church is to be individually applied to each and every member inside said Church. I don't think that can be done, and I think it is improper to even try to do it. The sins of a group do not apply to every individual, nor do the sins of the individual particularly apply to each one in a group.

For example, in 1 Corinthians 5:1-5 the Church at Corinth was Chastised for accepting one who was morally apprehensible into the community of believers. Was the community at fault for adultery? No, they were faulted for accepting adultery and boasting about accepting this adultery. Not only that, how did Paul learn about this as to write the letter? Most likely, someone in the Corinthian Church wrote him about this situation. Now, would this person be guilty along with the rest of the general community? No. In this way, there is a disconnect between the individuals who make up a local community of believers, a Church, and that individual Church. This is why I think it is improper to simply assert that the Church IS the individuals that make up said Church.


Quote
1 Corinthians 5:6-8
Your boasting is not good. Do you not know that a little leaven leavens the whole lump? Cleanse out the old leaven that you may be a new lump, as you really are unleavened. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. Let us therefore celebrate the festival, not with the old leaven, the leaven of malice and evil, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.


What about this passage references sin or doctrine? It is in reference to BOASTING and the MALICE and EVIL that are derived from said boasting. You said this passage warns Christians
Quote
not to tolerate evil(presumedly all evil) or any false doctrines or else they loose their salvation.

How do you justify this? (1) The passage does not reference false doctrine, (2) is not about not tolerating any evil, and (3) does not talk about any consequences at all let alone losing one's salvation. Now, I disagree with your conclusion, and you may be correct in what your presenting, BUT you are definitely wrong in your application of 1 Corinthians 5:6-8 to justify your conclusion. We need to make sure what we are saying is what the Bible is presenting, or we are just proclaiming our own opinion.

Quote
“For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that He might destroy the works of the devil.” Why, if the sheep remain sheep and the (wolves, tares) goats remain goats, what’s the use since the works of the Devil has no effect on them?

Now here is our problem (between today’s Church and Gods Word); If this in Rev. means that Jesus is warning a Church of sheep to get rid of the goats and get the sheep back in line, that would be fine. But it is clear the message is to ‘repent’.


Here you are quite correct in your understanding of the Purpose of the Son of God. He came to destroy the works of the devil in those who believe in his name. Let me explain how I see it.

Jesus succeeded and will continue to succeed in this work of destroying the works of the devil. By the power of God, goats, evil men following after their own lusts and desires, aka those who do the works of the devil, are in time transformed into sheep, stupid animals who generally follow but may fall or get lost from time to time. These sheep grow and are molded into beings who sin less and less and glorify God more and more.

Jesus died to take away the sin. Jesus' substitutionary dead on the Cross destroyed the works of the devil in us. "For by a single offering he (Jesus) has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified." Hebrews 10:14 (I don't have the time right now, but this verse is being correctly applied by me to this topic. Hebrews 7-10 are all about Jesus' work of redemption for Christians.) This death's benefit is applied to us through faith. So in the end, Jesus' death purified us forever from the punishment of sin, and God continues to work in us to purify our actions in time until we are glorified. This is all done that in it we might GLORIFY GOD all the more.

By the way, what is so wrong about a Christian repenting? We get off course all the time. "To repent" simply means to Change one's mind or change one's direction. I don't see how this word alone implies one has or will lose their salvation, if they do not repent. After all, it is the nature of sheep to repent to correction, and it is the nature of goats to not change in light of correction. I see repentance as a sign of being a true sheep. I see it as something that comes from being a sheep. I don't see it as being a standard by which one is made into a sheep, and I believe scripture backs me up on this one. Let’s continue onto the other things you said.


Quote
Here is where I see things in a different light;

How can a sheep become a goat? Here is how;

“But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner — not even to eat with such a person.” 1 Cor 5:11

A sheep will never call a goat ‘brother’. This is a message from sheep to sheep, or Sheppard to sheep.

1 Cor 5:9-13

How can goats leaven all the sheep? 1 Cor 5:6-8

How can dogs become Children of the Most High? Matt 15:26-28

And yet, here you have it.


Ariangabe, you said how does a sheep become a goat and citied 1 Cor. 5:11. 1 Cor. 5:11 is an expressed command to sheep, but what about this command makes you think that not obeying it turns one into a goat? The verses doesn’t reference goats or sheep. The verse doesn’t reference any consequence for not obeying. It simply strongly advises something to be done. There is nothing here about losing salvation.

If anything, the command to not socialize with these “goats” is to bring them to salvation. This is an evangelistic enterprise. Goats have slipped into the community. They believe they are saved when they are not, but their sin has shown them for who they are. Paul is saying remove them from the community so that they might know their error and repent and believe to be saved. Again, nothing in this passage is in reference to Christians loosing their salvation.

To your comment about sheep never calling a goat a “brother”: how did you come to this conclusion? The command in this passage was given because Sheep, true saved Christians, who were calling goats their bothers. Paul commanded them to stop in order that conviction and salvation might come to these goats. Obviously, in this passage, these Sheep remained sheep as they mistakenly calling goats sheep.

You are perfectly correct about how goats leaven the sheep, but what are they leavening them with? Answer: sin. The goats are introducing sin into the community of believers. Such an act should be opposed, but why? Those who deny the eternal security of the believer say because sin leads to loss of salvation and damnation. Those who agree with eternal security say sin causes a relational rift between God and man, and it causes God not to be glorified as he should.

Now, both parties agree to the concerns levied by those who agree with eternal security, but why does the eternal security crown deny sin leads to loss of salvation and damnation? Because, God will keep them secure. I will quickly give three verses two this end. See if you can find anyway around the direct implications of these verses.

1.
Quote
John 10:24-30
So the Jews gathered around him and said to him, “How long will you keep us in suspense? If you are the Christ, tell us plainly.” Jesus answered them, “I told you, and you do not believe. The works that I do in my Father's name bear witness about me, but you do not believe because you are not part of my flock. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father's hand. I and the Father are one.”


First off, why don’t these people believe? Because they are not his sheep.
Secondly, what does Jesus give to his sheep? Eternal life, they will never perish.
Why will they never perish? Because Jesus is keeping them in his hand.
Lastly, can anyone snatch them out of Jesus’ hand? No, because they are also in the hands of the Father.
Now, I know this passage has Christological implications also, but it definitely describes both God the Father and Jesus Christ actively, with power, securing the salvation of the sheep. Notice, the sheep have ETERNAL LIFE and they WILL NOT PERISH. Also notice, nothing in this passage implies the flock is required to do anything in order to remain saved. God just keeps them saved.

2.
Quote
Phillipians 1:3-7
I thank my God in all my remembrance of you, always in every prayer of mine for you all making my prayer with joy, because of your partnership in the gospel from the first day until now. And I am sure of this, that he who began a good work in you will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ. It is right for me to feel this way about you all, because I hold you in my heart, for you are all partakers with me of grace, both in my imprisonment and in the defense and confirmation of the gospel.


In this passage, Paul is praying for and encouraging those in Philippi. He mentions their partnership in the gospel, partaking of grace, and defense of the gospel. Obviously, Paul is talking to Christians about their walk in Christ.

Now, if one denies eternal security, then Paul encourages them with a strange line. He says “he who began a good work in you will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ.” This statement makes perfect sense from an eternal security perspective: God who began a good work in you, who saved you through what Jesus Christ did on the cross, will bring about ultimate salvation, glorification, to you at the day of Jesus Christ. What does it mean for “he who began a good work in you to bring it to completion”? That sounds like a promise from God to finally save those who are currently Christians.

3.
Quote
Romans 8:28-39
And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.

What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us? He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, how will he not also with him graciously give us all things? Who shall bring any charge against God's elect? It is God who justifies. Who is to condemn? Christ Jesus is the one who died—more than that, who was raised—who is at the right hand of God, who indeed is interceding for us. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword? As it is written,

“For your sake we are being killed all the day long;
we are regarded as sheep to be slaughtered.”

No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. For I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.


This passage is large and normally ignored by those who reject Eternal Security, but lets look at some stuff.
1. God works out everything that happens in time and space for the ultimate good of Christians. If God is doing this, then does he have the power and/or will to keep a Christian securely saved? Yes. If God is doing this, would God allow any circumstances befall a Christian as to lose AGAIN that which his Son died and paid for? No, v 31-39 makes it perfectly clear that no situation will cause one to lose their salvation. So in light of God’s sovereign will and power to bless and keep safe those who are saved, what in time or space could lead to one’s lost of salvation? Apparently NOTHING. Now, many say in response to this what about the free choice of the individual. Paul doesn’t seem to worry about the free will of the Christian getting in the way. Why should we, but lets move on for the is so much more in this passage.

2. v29-30 is called the Golden Chain of redemption. It includes several acts of God that are involved in saving God’s people. These are foreknowing, predestinating, calling, justifying, and glorifying. According to Ephesians 1:4-5, God’s choice of who would be saved, election, and predestination of all things related to bringing them unto salvation occurred before the creation of the world. God did these things for us before the creation of the world. Calling, God’s work in bringing one to faith, and Justification happens during the lifetime of individual Christians while glorification occurs at the end of the age. God does theses things.

Notice the wording.
“For those whom he foreknew he also predestined”. Who were Predestined? Answer: all those who were foreknown. Are there any who were foreknown who were not predestined? NO!
“those whom he predestined he also called” Who were called? Answer: all those who were predestined. Are there any who were predestined who were not called? NO!
”those whom he called he also justified”. Who are justified? Answer: all those who were called. Are their any who are called who were not justified? NO!
”those whom he justified he also glorified”. This is an odd saying. How many have been glorified? None yet save Jesus. Those who are saved will be glorified, but why say this in the past tense? Lets still follow the Logic. Who are to be glorified? Answer: all those who were justified? Are there any who were justified who are not to be glorified? NO!

See, keeping the grammatical structure going emphasizes the fact that all those who are currently saved, justified, will be finally saved, glorified. The conclusion is so strong that one could speak about it as if it has already occurred. Okay, given God’s perfect foreknowledge of all things in history, his sovereignty over all things in history, and his proclamation in perfect Scripture of this chain of redemption, how can there be any doubt about losing one’s salvation? If one is ever justified/saved in this life, then they know they are one in this chain thus securing their final glorification.

I see absolutely no way around this divine proclamation. “Salvation is of the LORD”, and those who are justified at any time in their life will be glorified in heaven.

3. v31-39 continues the theme that NOTHING WHATSOEVER in time or space, in heaven or under the earth, or anywhere else will be able to separate us from our salvation, our love relationship with Christ. And, this is all predicated on God keeping us. We don’t keep ourselves saved. God keeps us saved. God is the one who is FOR US.

I wanted to end this discussion with a potent observation. v39 ends with the words “nor anything else in all creation”. The KJV put it this way “nor any other creature”. Are we not in Creation? Are we not creatures? How can Paul say NOR ANY OTHER CREATURE and the Christian still be able to get in the way of God’s plan and cause the lose of their salvation? I don’t see how man being able to lose his own salvation is a legitimate understanding, if God says through Paul’s pen nor anything on the created order will stop me from saving my people.


Back to your Post

Quote
Again, a warning to sheep from turning to goats/wolves. These next verses are to the sheep; ‘Little Children’ not to be deceived. According to once-saved-always-saved you cannot deceive sheep since they are always in their Sheppard’s watch, shielded from harm and safe in the eternal arms of the Great Sheppard!


One quick point of clarification. We do not hold that a sheep cannot be deceived. We believe that a sheep cannot be led away to the point of losing Salvation. Salvation is not such a precarious thing. Christians can sin, be deceived, publicly (although not truly) deny Christ, etc without losing their Salvation. Those types of phenomena are a reflection of the flesh that still lives within our souls. Look at how Paul describes himself as a Christian.

Quote
Romans 7:13-25
Did that which is good, then, bring death to me? By no means! It was sin, producing death in me through what is good, in order that sin might be shown to be sin, and through the commandment might become sinful beyond measure. For we know that the law is spiritual, but I am of the flesh, sold under sin. For I do not understand my own actions. For I do not do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate. Now if I do what I do not want, I agree with the law, that it is good. So now it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me. For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh. For I have the desire to do what is right, but not the ability to carry it out. For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I keep on doing. Now if I do what I do not want, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me.
So I find it to be a law that when I want to do right, evil lies close at hand. For I delight in the law of God, in my inner being, but I see in my members another law waging war against the law of my mind and making me captive to the law of sin that dwells in my members. Wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death? Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, I myself serve the law of God with my mind, but with my flesh I serve the law of sin.


Notice the conclusion of this discussion, “I myself sever the law of God with my mind, but with my flesh I serve the law of sin.” The Christian always lives in this state in this world. We will no longer be plagued with the flesh when we are glorified, but until then, we live as saint and sinner with two natures fighting against each other within our souls. We do contend against the sin in us, and when we sin, we are cut to the heart, but NONE OF THIS affects our ETERNAL STATE before GOD. After all, we didn’t save ourselves; it is not our within our power to keep ourselves secure in Salvation.


Quote
1 John 3:7-9
7 Little children, let no one deceive you. He who practices righteousness is righteous, just as He is righteous. 8 He who sins is of the devil, for the devil has sinned from the beginning.

Both sheep and goats can sin. God didn’t create men on this earth as wolves, tares, goats! The evil one did that by introducing sin in the world. God created a perfect sinless Adam and Eve. It is when they sinned that they started to die and change to goats. The first to become a wolf was Cain by killing his brother Able.

For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that He might destroy the works of the devil.
By the Son of God both blemished sheep and goats and even dogs can stop sinning, and by repenting they all become in good relation with God through Christ who saves them.

9 Whoever has been born of God does not sin, for His seed remains in him; and he cannot sin, because he has been born of God.

Do you now see?  ‘Born of God’ is the transformation back to a sinless life! ‘Born again’ from goats to sheep.


There is a lot in this quote, and there is a lot of it that is correct. To my response:

1) Yes, both sheep and goats can sin.

2) God did not create men to be Goats. He created them all NEUTRAL with a choice.

3) Yes, man fell when he sinned, but when man sinned, he instantly became a GOAT, and goats produce goats. This is who we are NATURALLY. Sinner’s who sin. We sin because we are naturally sinners. We don’t change back and forth due to our choices. We are what we are, goats. After man made his choice in Adam our fates were set. We are what we are, sinners. Doomed goats/sinners who will be destroyed.

4) Wolf and tares are other analogies. Your right that Cain was a wolf, but this is not relevant to our discussion. As the analogies go a wolf is nothing but a goat with malicious intent to harm sheep and a tare is a goat who is pretending to be a sheep.

5) Amen, Jesus, the Son of God, was manifested that He might destroy the works of the devil. Jesus came so that we all might not be destroyed as the goats we are.

6) You said “By the Son of God both blemished sheep and goats and even dogs can stop sinning, and by repenting they all become in good relation with God through Christ who saves them.” This sentence is completely confused and off base. Goats are all those who are lost and are currently not going to Heaven; they are unsaved. Sheep are those who are saved; those who are currently on their way to heaven. Goats don’t repent. Sheep repent. Goats live to sin; they make a practice of sinning; they live to do what they want, sin. Sheep make a practice of righteousness; they follow God; they live for God. Sheep may fall into sin, but they confess their sin and follow God all over again because that is who they are now in Christ. There are two categories of people: sheep and goats. God grants life and gives spiritual birth to the goats changing them into sheep.

Lets look at a few verses through John that express how men become saved. “But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God, who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God.” (John 1:12-13) Notice these men came to be God’s Children by God’s will. Those who receive him and believe in his name define the group who are “children of God”, but they came to be Children because they were “born of God.”

“Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.” “Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born again.’ The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes. So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit.” (John 3:3,7-8) The analogy here is not sheep and goats; it is of those who are born spiritually or not. The two categories of men are the same. They are just being described by a different analogy. Notice God must act, God must birth someone spiritually in order for them to be saved. If one looks at this through the goat/sheep analogy, then God must change one from a goat into a sheep in order for them to be saved. Notice also there is no telling who God will bless with birthing; the Spirit births Christians where it wishes.

“This is the work of God, that you believe in him whom he has sent.” “I am the bread of life; whoever comes to me shall not hunger, and whoever believes in me shall never thirst. But I said to you that you have seen me and yet do not believe. All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out. For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will but the will of him who sent me. And this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up on the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who looks on the Son and believes in him should have eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.” “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him. And I will raise him up on the last day.” (John 6: 29,36-40) Notice even belief is God’s work in us. Jesus Gives us life. This life is eternal. It does not require more bread or water to sustain it. It is eternal. Notice also who gets this eternal life. Those who are given from the Father to the Son. Being given defines who is saved. Being given defines who believes, who follows, who practices righteousness. These are given eternal life and will never perish. Jesus will raise them up. THEY ARE SAVED FOREVER; THEY WILL BE IN HEAVEN. All of Salvation is in God’s hands, not ours. We are not but GRATEFUL RECIPIENTS of his Grace. Lastly, notice that no one who is not drawn or given can receive these benefits.

“Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever feeds on me, he also will live because of me. This is the bread that came down from heaven, not like the bread the fathers ate and died. Whoever feeds on this bread will live forever.” (John 6:53-58) Notice the emphasis on ETENAL LIFE. Whoever eats “HAS ETENAL LIFE.” They will be raised up on the last day. Are these statements a lie? Can one feed on this bread and not live forever? Can one HAVE ETENAL LIFE yet perish?

“It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh is no help at all. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life. But there are some of you who do not believe.” (For Jesus knew from the beginning who those were who did not believe, and who it was who would betray him.) And he said, “This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted him by the Father.” (John 6:44; 60-65) This is the conclusion of John Chapter 6. Notice who gives life; notice who grants life.

By the time we get to John 10 Jesus is referring to those who are saved as sheep. The sheep vs. goats analogy comes from Matthew 25:32-33. “Before him will be gathered all the nations, and he will separate people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. And he will place the sheep on his right, but the goats on the left.” This is referring to the end of the ages. The sheep are those who were saved. The goats are those who were cast into hell.

7)You are correct in that if one repents, believes, then they will be saved. They will be in a right relationship with God. But, being in a right relationship with God, being saved is being a sheep. See how your statement is somewhat confused?

8) You are correct in that born of God is the transformation from being a goat into being a sheep, but you are incorrect to think being born of God is the making of one to be literally sinless in this life. Lets look at a better translation of 1 John 3:7-9

Quote
Little children, let no one deceive you. Whoever practices righteousness is righteous, as he is righteous. Whoever makes a practice of sinning is of the devil, for the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil. No one born of God makes a practice of sinning, for God's seed abides in him, and he cannot keep on sinning because he has been born of God.


Notice the focus on practice. This is to relate the concept of the action that defines what one is in this life. If one’s life is defined by sinning, ie not living for God, then they are are of the devil. If one’s life is defined by pursing righteousness, then they are of God. v9 basically says those born of God live a life that reflects that reality. They don’t sin as they did before; they purse righteousness. Why do they do this? Because, God seed abides in them. The Holy Spirit “who is the guarantee of our inheritance” (Eph. 1:14) is that seed. He insures we will abide and not continue to sin as we did.

By the way, did you consider that the one who is born of God is not ABLE to keep on sinning. It does say “he cannot keep on sinning”. If one who is born of God is not ABLE to keep on sinning, then how can they lose their salvation by sinning? I see v9 as a promise that the Holy Spirit living within me will keep me from losing my salvation because of sin. I don’t see anything here that makes me think I can lose my salvation.



Quote
Now if you say that sheep cannot sin, beware:

1 Cor 15:33 Do not be deceived: "Evil company corrupts good habits."  If you are a ‘Once Saved Always Saved Trinitarian’ you would respond to this; ‘yeah right! I’m a sheep and can do no wrong. I can celebrate pagan holydays like Christmas with Santa and his demonic elves, the goddess Easter with her fertility bunnies and her painted eggs that represents the birth of the universe, kill my own Christian Brother in war, sue them in the Godless courts judged by Godless judges, yes, I can do anything I want, even abortion is not really a sin since it is the law. In Romans it says; I have to ‘give unto César what is Cesar’s and unto God what is Gods. The earth is Cesar’s and God ordained him as ruler, I am obliged!’

Dear Brothers in Christ, look at this and ask yourself if this next comment to sheep or to the goats?

1 John 1:8-10

It is to us all, Jew (lost-sheep) and Gentile (goats/dogs) to “confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”

Again, should a sheep fall away and turn back to his old sinful self (goat) after all the warnings, we are given this;

1 John 2:1-2

What is that; “… and not for ours only but also for the whole world”? Can Jesus turn the whole world of; wolves, goats, bad fish and tares into sheep? Yes, for we know that is why the Son of God came;

1 John 3:16-17

So, from sheep (Adam) we became goats (Cain) and went downhill to Noah where the whole world was goats and wolves and yes, dogs where God destroyed them. But after the flood things went back to their old ways, sin ruled once again.

But you know the rest, how God brought the whole world back to Himself through His Son, yes even the common like the dogs and the goats;

Acts 10:10-16

And friends, who are we to call ‘what God has cleansed common or unclean?’

And finally:

Matt 13:47-50

This sums it up. The sea is the world and the fish represents the people of the world. They all heard the message (cleansed), they all had a chance to ‘be born again’ (transformed) from being evil (goats, wolves, dogs) to a new life as good sheep. But sadly the hearts of many of them remained hardened to the cleansing and kept their traditions, their idols, their man made rules and laws, and they remained ugly and unusable fish and so the angels will separate the wicked from the just and cast them into a furnace of fire.

This is not about fish, are fish good and evil? This is about what we do, whether we become good or evil, a goat or a sheep, or become so evil that God calls us dogs and wolves. But we better change to good by repenting, so when the angels come with their net and reap the earth, we will be thrown in with the good fish and not to be burned with the wicked.

So as it is written, Adam sinned, and his son Cain sinned even more and from there man snowballed downward to a point they were no more sheep from Gods flock but became like ravening wolves, dogs wallowing in sexual immorality, lust, passion, greed, hate and murder. They became from children of God (sinless) to the children of the devil (sinful). But God planned a new rebirth for us, and through His Son Jesus Christ we can transform from even dogs to Christ’s sheep.


No offense, but this entire section is very similar to the last section. It contains some truth, it has some of the same mistakes as the last section, and it doesn’t really interact with Perseverance of the Saints. I can’t speak to everything so I will let what I have already said stand.

Quote
1 John 3:20-22

In the above verse we are not sheep because God made us to be sheep, it is because we ‘keep the commandments’.


I did what to interact with this comment. I will admit that there is a one to one relationship between those who are saved and those who keep the commandments, but there is nothing in this passage or any other passage that says that men are saved, are sheep, are good fish, etc. etc. etc. by keeping the commandments. Remember Paul’s discussion of this topic in Romans 4.

Quote
Romans 4:1-9
What then shall we say was gained by Abraham, our forefather according to the flesh?For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. For what does the Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness.” Now to the one who works, his wages are not counted as a gift but as his due. And to the one who does not work but believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted as righteousness, just as David also speaks of the blessing of the one to whom God counts righteousness apart from works:

“Blessed are those whose lawless deeds are forgiven,
and whose sins are covered;
blessed is the man against whom the Lord will not count his sin.

Is this blessing then only for the circumcised, or also for the uncircumcised? We say that faith was counted to Abraham as righteousness.


Justified means to be declared righteous. It means to be saved. We are justified by faith, NOT BY WORKS. It is not WHAT WE DO that saves us. It is WHAT CHRIST DID. Neither are we given this benefit because of what we do. We are saved by Grace. We are Saved by Grace through Faith. If our works are involved in make ourselves worthy, then Paul was lying to us when he said “For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.” (Eph 2:8-10)?

If works play any part in our salvation, then we have something to boast about. If there is anything in us, in what we do, that qualifies, merits, or conditions us as worthy to be saved as opposed to others, then Salvation is not by grace, it is not a gift. It would be by merit, by works. Do you see how this concept flies in the face of what Paul taught? Not to mention, it is not found in any Scripture.

Paul’s overarching argument is we have all sinned. Therefor, any works done by us are not able to save us. We are condemned already in John’s words(cf. John 3:18). That is why we need grace. Remember the STANDARD for Salvation is PERFECTION(cf. Matt 5:48). Unless one is perfect in all they do throughout their life, they will be found guilty before God. One who believes on Jesus will be covered with Jesus’ righteousness—A righteousness that is found apart from the Law(Rom. 3:21-22). This righteousness is by Faith, apart from works of the Law(3:28).

Seriously, you need to read Romans, and I mean in one sitting. You need to read what Paul thought is the Gospel. Read it like a book. It was designed to be read aloud to a Church. Read it out loud, if you need, but read it in one sitting and simply listen to what Paul is teaching. Don’t try to integrate what you hear/read into what you believe. Who cares what I believe or what you believe? The true question is what does the text teach. What is Paul teaching those in Rome? I know he is not teaching one must do good in order to be saved by Jesus. He teaches one is saved by Jesus in order that we might do good in order to praise God(cf Eph 2:10).


Quote
1 John 5:18

Again, ‘born of God’ is a change from goats, dogs, sheep that are blemished to sheep without blemish and the wicked one cannot touch us.

1 John 1:6-7

See, the whole Bible is about change to good, a rebirth, then to be aware not to fall back to sin and be eaten by the serpent that dragon of old, for we are not ignorant of his ways. If from perfect Adam man can turn into goats and dogs and then through Christ become sheep again, what makes you think that we cannot regress from sheep back to that sinful nature and become Satan’s servants; dogs and wolves again? Satan would love you to think that once saved you are ‘safe’! Please Brothers in Christ don’t close your eyes and fall asleep like this, wake up and ‘hold on to, guard what you have’!!!!


“What makes you think that we cannot regress from sheep back to that sinful nature and become Satan’s servants; dogs and wolves again?” Because God the Father and Jesus Christ keep us secure in their hands cf. John 10:30.

Quote
1 Tim 6:19-21

If you think that we are not to fight every day a good fight to remain sheep, then you have fallen asleep a long time ago my friend and Satan already got you. Wake up!

1 Tim 6:12-16

For now till That Day of our Lord we must fight to remain sheep. As long as WE remain sheep, Jesus the Good Shepherd will keep us safe. Brother, the entire New Testament is written for us Believers, us Sheep to warn us, reminding us to beware of turning. It is NOT to unbelievers.

Jesus sent us to tell the Good News to the unbelievers so those that hearken to our voice can turn to the Bible and believe in Him who sent us. THEN and only then is the Bible to them, after they turned from dogs and goats to sheep. Jesus doesn’t keep an eye on the world, to keep them safe, but He does keep an eye on us, to keep us from danger. If there was no danger for us sheep, why all the warning?

But if you listen to man made doctrines that tell you once your in your in, and that now that you’re a Christian, you need not worry because it wasn’t your choice anyways, that it was Gods choice before the creation, and there is no way you can loose this prize, and if you believe that there is no way for a sheep to become a goat, then Satan has put you to sleep already. You are like the five Foolish Virgins who thought that their intellect instead of Gods Word will last them until Jesus comes, but realized that their intellect and their trust in men’s doctrine is not quite enough to last late into the night. The Groom tarried, and their intellect ran out of oil and when they were awakened to the Grooms coming, they panicked. Don’t let this happen to you my dear friend. Get the oil that lasts  endlessly given by the Holy Spirit and your lamp will never go out.

I have a feeling that Satan has also told you that you can fight it out with guns at Armageddon, good verses evil, and just before evil kills you, you will be raptured out of here, right?
How many great Martyrs went gloriously to their death? Dying for the Lord is the most glorious reward that can be bestowed upon a Christian. Why would God want us to shoot it out with the evil, to kill as many as we can when Jesus made it clear that we are to love those that hate and persecute us? Where do Christians get this brutal counter-attack against the army of the anti-Christ? With all the cross-fire, you are sure to kill many innocent who still have a chance to repent. But hey, we’re Christians and cannot do any wrong, and when things get rough, or when the enemy is about to capture us, Christ zaps us out of here leaving planes and cars crashing into everyone.

Makes a good book and a good action movie, and even a great PC Game, and the world loves it. But it is a deception of Satan of the worst kind. This is almost as bad as Christmas and Santa replacing Christ in Christian hearts. May God open your eyes.

“Yes Christian” Satan whispers; “you have nothing to worry about, since once you’re saved you can never loose it. Yesssss … Christians are not perfect, they’re just forgiven. So go on and live it up, have your sport idols, your American Idols, your rock-star idols, your tree idols and all the pagan idols. Hey, if they bother you a bit, just add Christ and mass to it, (both holy words) before the Tree, and presto you have a Christ-mass-tree!

You can go on killing other people in countries your President invades unfairly, even if they’re Christians. Serve your government and you shall serve God. Vote dear Christian, if nothing else, vote between two evil and ungodly President runner-ups, I mean its better to have the lesser evil to tell you you’re no more a Christian Nation, that you are no longer to mention the name Jesus in public. After all, remember that it was God who put up this government, Sadam, Bush, Hitler, Mussolini, Arafat, all Gods servants, remember? So don’t worry, your hands are clean Christian.”

Satan even says; “Hey Christian, confused when your actions contradict the Bible, no problem. Filter it through the Trinity Doctrine I gave you. You will get so confused that it won’t matter who you worship. Once you are blinded, none of that really matters anymore. Just use mumbo-jumbo like all my other ministers (not talking about you guys here, you are very intelligent and know your Bible, only you filter it through doctrines of men). Wing it and use a lot of scripture quoting, (TV Ministers) that gets them every time since everyone is afraid to go against Gods Word.”

No my friends, first we (dogs goats) gentiles are to be born again into sheep, and only then are we shepherded by Christ. This is when these verses come alive for us;

Matt 18:12-14

God loves to find lost sheep. When sheep get lost, they cry. If a sheep is headed away from the fold without crying, he’s looking for another fold with another shepherd, or is on a mission like the Prodigals son. The Shepherd will not leave the rest to go wondering aimlessly looking for I don’t know what. The sheep and the son have to make a turn back, and if he gets lost, must cry out before the Shepherd will run to it in joy. The story cannot be interpreted with any other meaning.

God bless you all, please think this through. The end is so near, the ‘abomination of desolation’ has been standing there front of the whole world, and Christians are looking for it in the future! The anti-Christ, the real deal man who claims to be in the place of God has been here for a long time too. Why are we talking and arguing about basic principles like idols, and whether we can loose our salvation or not? We are to eat meat and yet we can barely drink milk. Come on dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ, lets move on, midnight is upon us and I can hear the Bridegroom coming. Can’t you?

In Jesus name
Odon

P.S.

How can Christians be satisfied with being a Baptist, a Calvinist, a Jehovah’s Witness, Catholic and so on, and not see the danger of this division? There is ONE Church and the members be in one mind in it. When one wiser reveals something the other did not know, they all accept it with great joy, not as we have it now, saying with content: “Well, that’s how you understand it, and this is how I do, but that’s O.K. you have your views and I have mine. We all worship the same God, and that is the most important.”

NO. The Spirit teaches us all with the same understanding. There is no doctrine for the Baptists and another for the Presbyterians and another for the Catholics. We must all believe the same thing about every subject. There are no two roads that lead to Paradise, the Kingdom of God, only ONE. 1 Cor 3:1-4


The rest of this reads as a sermon. I disagree with a lot of it, but I don’t believe it would be particularly productive for me to respond to all of it. I would like to say a couple of things.

1) I have a great amount of doubt for the concept of the rapture too.

2) I don’t know how close we are to the end. Every generation fancied itself as the last, but you may be correct. We just don’t know.

3) I don’t see concepts like Christmas as particularly sinful. If we simply keep Christ in mind, I don’t see how celebrating Christ’s birth by congregating with the Church and with family once a year matters.

4) I don’t like most of what goes on around Easter—eggs and bunnies. But, I see no reason not to celebrate our risen Lord at Church.

5) Lastly, we are not satisfied with labels like Baptist, Calvinist, Presbyterian, Orthodox, Reformed, Methodist, etc. I am a Christian. That is what I am. If you wish for a more detailed description of what I believe, then I will add the qualification Baptist because I believe that Adult, Believer Baptism is the only Biblical form of Baptism, I will add the qualification Doctrines of Grace, Reformed, or Calvinistic to express my soteriological perspective, and I will add the qualification Evangelical to express my perspective on Scripture. I do this because if one simply asserts that they are a Christ follow or Christian, then the question arises what Kind of Christian. We all consider ourselves to be truly Christian, but that word means little in todays world.

Yes, there should be no divisions, but as long as these divisions exist, we need to put up with them the best we can. One person can do little to truthfully and faithfully remove these divisions. Every time Christians come together to create unity, they either form yet another denomination or compromise Biblical truth, sometimes both. What can be done? Faithfully follow Jesus in everything we do, and let God sort out his Church.


God Bless
IP: --   

Calvary Chapel and the doctrines of grace
ariandgabe
Group: Member
Posts: 14
Status:

Gods Spirit joins our spirit to make us His children
Thank you so much DGB, and by all means you do not offend me. How could someone called a Christian, who read my weak long letter and answered with such deep thought offend me.

It is I who ask you to please bear with me, my tactless use of words, and my 'shotgun' responses. That is not what I intended, but yes, I see what you mean.

So please forgive me if I sound so harsh at times, I do understand the implications of this 'Once Saved Always Saved' doctrine, to me it is as dangerous and damaging as the trinity one.

I will now re-read your comments and make sure I understand clearly what you are saying. Then I will answer.

God bless you for all this good reading. I pray to God through His Son to help us see eye to eye on this and every Word that proceeds out of the mouth of God through the Bible.
Odon
IP: --   

« Previous    Next »

Threaded Mode | Tell a friend | Print  

4


Jump To :


Users viewing this topic
1 guests, 0 users.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is September 6, 2010, 6:07 pm.

  Powered By AEF 1.0.8 © 2007-2008 Electron Inc.Queries: 11  |  Page Created In:0.228

Caughtup Ministries